Healthcare Regulation After Loper Bright and Corner Post: Agency Implications, Litigation Challenges, Client Impact

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Health
- event Date
Thursday, September 12, 2024
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE webinar will guide healthcare practitioners through the recent notable U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the long-standing Chevron doctrine, and Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which expands the time period during which plaintiffs may challenge agency rules. The panel will address the significant impact these decisions will have on federal agencies, federal rulemaking, and federally regulated industries.
Faculty

Mr. Grimm maintains a national practice guiding and advising health care providers and investment firms through the complex regulatory, transactional, and government enforcement challenges in the health care industry. He focuses his practice in the areas of mergers and acquisitions; strategic and compliance planning; fraud and abuse; Medicare reimbursement; health information privacy and security; and telehealth. Mr. Grimm represents a wide range of clients including health systems, investment funds, group practices, clinical laboratories, specialty providers, and medical device manufacturers. He previously served as a former CEO of multiple acute-care hospitals throughout the United States, and remains active in health care administration as a Fellow of the American College of Healthcare Executives (FACHE), the premier certification in health care management. This unique background enables Douglas to provide legal counsel with a practical, pragmatic perspective gained from years of experience as a health care executive and attorney.

Drawing on more than a decade of litigation experience with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the General Counsel for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Division, Mr. Tsui assists healthcare clients seeking to develop comprehensive and durable approaches to the Medicare regulatory environments. His extensive background as lead agency counsel and his track record of success before both administrative and federal courts nationwide provides a unique optic to support the critical legal and business challenges his clients confront. A trusted advocate for healthcare providers and payers alike, Mr. Tsui also assists clients in the medical device, biopharmaceutical, and other emerging healthcare technology industries bring their products to market with confidence.

Mr. Maida counsels healthcare and life sciences clients on government investigations, regulatory compliance and compliance program development. Having served as a government official, he has extensive experience in healthcare fraud and abuse and compliance issues, including the federal and state Anti-Kickback and Stark Laws and Medicare and Medicaid coverage and payment rules. Mr. Maida represents clients in False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam matters, government audits, civil monetary penalty and exclusion investigations, and CMS suspension, and revocation actions, negotiating and implementing corporate integrity agreements, and making government self-disclosures. He also draws on his background in government investigations to assist clients in evaluating, developing and implementing corporate compliance programs. Mr. Maida previously served as deputy chief of the Administrative and Civil Remedies Branch of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG), where he represented the agency on investigating FCA and civil monetary penalty cases, negotiating and monitoring corporate integrity agreements, and defending exclusion appeals. While serving at HHS, he was a principal author of the OIG’s current Self-Disclosure Protocol.
Description
Two notable decisions at the end of the recent U.S. Supreme Court term, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System will have a significant impact on federal agency rulemaking, rule implementation, and legal challenges to federal rules. Healthcare counsel, in an industry highly regulated by federal agencies such as HHS, FDA, and CMS, should understand the implications of these rulings and how their clients may be affected.
Loper Bright overruled the Chevron doctrine which, for 40 years, has served as the two-step framework for federal courts in deciding disputes between federal agencies and private parties challenging agency regulations. Under Chevron, courts would first ask whether Congress had "directly spoken to the precise question at issue" in the statute. If not, the courts were required to defer to the agency's interpretation as long as it was reasonable. While the Chevron doctrine has been chipped away over the years, Loper Bright has now formally overruled Chevron and put the task of interpreting statutory provisions back into the hands of federal courts.
Corner Post has increased agency exposure to suits by redefining when the statute of limitations period begins during which rules may be challenged. The Court held that the six-year statute of limitations for suits against the federal government begins to run only once the plaintiff has been injured, a significant change from the prior stance that the six-year period began once the rule was published. Therefore, entities formed within the last six years may challenge regulations that have stood for decades.
Listen as our expert panel guides practitioners through the recent Loper Bright and Corner Post decisions and discusses the impact on the healthcare industry where new challenges to longstanding regulations may be brought, even if they had previously been upheld under Chevron. The panel will also discuss potential client impact.
Outline
- Introduction: a brief history of federal regulatory interpretation under Chevron
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
- Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
- Legislative and regulatory effect
- Regulatory litigation challenges
- Client impact
- Practitioner takeaways
Benefits
The panel will review these and other important issues:
- How will Loper Bright impact judicial review of healthcare regulations?
- What effect will Corner Post have on litigation challenging agency rules?
- How may the decisions affect healthcare regulatory rulemaking?
- What is the potential impact of the decisions on clients?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Related Courses

The ACA and the New Administration: CMS Proposed Rule Impacting Marketplace Eligibility and Other Notable Actions
Tuesday, April 22, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Healthcare Speaker Programs and AKS Compliance: Regulatory Update, Lessons Learned From Recent Settlements
Tuesday, May 27, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

HIPAA and Beyond: Health Information Privacy Updates
Tuesday, May 27, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
Navigating Modern Legal Challenges: A Comprehensive Guide
- Business & Professional Skills
- Career Advancement