BarbriSFCourseDetails

Course Details

This CLE course will provide bankruptcy and lender counsel with a review of the Fifth Circuit's latest decision in In re Ultra Petroleum, 51 F.4th 138 (5th Cir. 2022), the Delaware Bankruptcy Court's decision in In re Hertz Corp., Adv. Proc. No. 21-50995 (Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 9, 2022), and the solvent debtor exception, highlighting widening conflicts in the relevant case law and emerging theories regarding both enforceability of make-whole and no-call provisions in bankruptcy loan agreements and protection of entitlement to make-whole premiums.

Faculty

Description

Make-whole provisions, or yield premiums, are intended to protect the fixed-rate noteholder's rights by requiring compensation for the damage caused by the issuer's early payment in a lower-rate market. The circuits and lower courts are split about whether a prepayment premium, as a matter of law, is disallowable as "unmatured interest" under Section 502(b)(2). The issue varies in difficulty depending on the specific facts of a given case, and in part, it arises from ambiguous descriptions of what triggers the premium.

In In re Ultra Petroleum (2022), the Fifth Circuit held that a make-whole premium, as a matter of law, is generally disallowable as "unmatured interest," but that the solvent debtor exception may still require payment, and that a class of creditors holding make-whole premium rights may be denied those rights and stripped of a vote in Chapter 11 by "unimpairing" the class.

Ultra conflicts with Third and Second Circuit decisions: one upholding make-whole premiums and the other disallowing make-wholes when the specific language of the indenture did not require them, respectively. Trustees and noteholders will face increased uncertainty about the value and enforceability of make-whole claims as courts debate the nature of make-whole premiums as unmatured interest or liquidated damages.

Listen as our authoritative panel analyzes various theories employed by bankruptcy courts in considering the enforceability of make-whole provisions. The panel will review recent bankruptcy case law developments and offer best practices for lenders to protect these claims.

Outline

  1. General considerations and strategies
  2. Prioritizing what relief to request in First-Day motions
  3. Procedural and evidentiary considerations
  4. Selected First-Day motions
    1. First-Day declarations
    2. Debtor-in-possesion financing
    3. Cash collateral
    4. Wages and employee compensation
    5. Critical vendors
    6. Reclamation procedures
    7. Cross-border foreign representative orders

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • Will disallowance of make-whole claims under Section 502(b)(2) affect secured creditors' seeking make-whole payments pursuant to the exceptions under Section 506(b)?
  • What factors do bankruptcy courts consider in analyzing the enforceability of make-whole and no-call provisions in loan agreements?
  • Is the impairment aspect of the ruling consistent with the statute? Could it be subject to further challenge in other circuits?
  • What are best practices for counsel to lenders and bondholders to protect entitlement to make-whole premiums?
  • What lessons can you take from Ultra Petroleum and other bankruptcy rulings?