Comparative Advertising: Avoiding Trademark Infringement, Disparagement
Lessons From Recent Cases, Avoiding Pitfalls, and Substantiating Comparative Claims

Course Details
- smart_display Format
Live Online with Live Q&A
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Trademark and Copyright
- event Date
Thursday, May 29, 2025
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE course will guide counsel to companies using or facing competitor comparative advertising. The panel will examine the use of competitors' marks/logos in advertising, puffery vs. actionable comparative advertising, the use of consumer-generated content related to competitors, and substantiating claims.
Faculty

Mr. Gallagher has deep experience in trademark clearance, investigation, prosecution, as well as client counseling and management of domestic and international trademark portfolios. He also has significant experience assisting clients with trademark enforcement, opposition and cancellation proceedings; brand protection programs; trademark, unfair competition and false advertising disputes and litigation; internet domain name disputes and proceedings (UDRPs); and trademark licensing. He provides tailored advice for handling IP issues involving social media; IP due diligence and IP licensing; copyright counseling, registration, protection and litigation; Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notice and take down procedures; and domain name acquisition.

Mr. Ford has litigated trademark, trade dress, and false advertising cases in federal court and before the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board and regularly advises clients on issues relating to their trademark and brand management. He is a member of the International Trademark Association’s Non-Traditional Marks committee and has been the chair of its U.S. Litigation task force since 2020. He has guest lectured on trademark and trade dress issues at New York University School of Law and Rutgers School of Law. In 2022, Managing IP recognized him as a U.S. “rising star” for trademark work.
Mr. Ford also has an active practice advising clients on cybersecurity incident preparation and response, including in connection with criminal and civil litigation, as well as federal and state regulatory investigations. His recent matters include advising clients managing responses to corporate data breaches, business email compromises, ransomware incidents and other data security issues, including risk management for cybersecurity and business continuity planning.

Ms. McGinn’s practice focuses on matters involving the convergence of advertising and promotions, emerging media, technology, privacy, and intellectual property law. She works with many of the best-known brands in the country, including H&R Block and the Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. and its confection brands. Embracing a business-minded approach, she helps clients develop new brand assets and assists them in promoting and advertising their brands and products. Clients--including Turner Broadcasting and its programming properties, for which she handles trademark clearances for new shows, web properties, interstitials and sweepstakes--regularly turn to Ms. McGinn for trademark counseling services. In the advertising and promotions facet of her practice, she works with clients on sweepstakes review, copy review, and promotion design and fulfillment, with an emphasis on internet and interactive advertising and promotions. Ms. McGinn also provides legal services for digital companies and app developers, handling a variety of IP matters and privacy policies and practices relating to websites and mobile applications. As a thought leader in her industry, she frequently speaks at events and conferences. Ms. McGinn also serves as the firm’s first chief diversity partner and co-chair of the Diversity Committee.
Description
Many companies use comparative advertising to differentiate and demonstrate that their product is superior to the competitors. Companies, however, should carefully navigate the potential legal issues that may arise when using a competitor's trademark or product in the company's advertising.
What are the parameters for claiming the company's product is better than that of the competitor? When does making negative claims about the competitor's product amount to disparagement? When does including a competitor's product or mark in one's advertising amount to trademark infringement? What evidence is needed to substantiate claims? Companies and counsel must be able to avoid potential pitfalls when using comparative advertising.
Listen as our authoritative panel of IP attorneys examines the use of competitor's marks/logos in advertising, what is permissible, and what puts the company at risk of infringing the competitor's IP rights. The panel will also discuss puffery vs. actionable comparative advertising and the use of consumer comments or user-generated content related to competitors in advertising, and substantiating claims. The panel will also address what happens when an advertiser's claim is not intended to be comparative on its face but could reasonably be interpreted as such.
Outline
- Use of competitor marks/logos in advertising
- What is permissible
- When can a competitor's marks, logos, trade dress be used in advertising
- Risks of infringing the competitor's IP rights
- Puffery vs. actionable comparative advertising
- Use of consumer comments, user-generated content related to competitors
- Substantiating claims
- Best practices for avoiding trademark infringement and other potential pitfalls
Benefits
The panel will review these and other vital questions:
- When and how can a company use a competitor's trademark, logo, or trade dress in its advertising?
- What strategies should counsel employ when challenging a competitor's comparative advertising?
- District court vs. the National Advertising Division: Which forum should you choose for challenging comparative advertising claims?
- When can companies use consumer-generated content about competitors in their advertising?
- How can surveys be used to support arguments regarding implied claims?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Related Courses

Trademark Infringement Monetary Remedies: Protecting IP Rights and Overcoming Challenges
Wednesday, May 7, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Comparative Advertising: Avoiding Trademark Infringement, Disparagement
Friday, April 11, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Demonstrating Use in Commerce for Trademark Registration and Enforcement
Tuesday, April 15, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Functionality in Trade Dress Prosecution and Litigation: Protecting the Look and Feel of Products and Packaging
Thursday, April 10, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
Getting the Most Out of BARBRI Resources
- Learning & Development
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development
Transforming CLE from a Requirement to a Career Advantage
- Learning & Development
- Career Advancement
- Talent Development