Construction Subcontractor Default Insurance: Maximizing SDI Coverage and Streamlining the Claim Process

SDI can be a viable alternative to surety bonds, depending on the size and scope of the project. SDI policies are purchased by the project manager and obligate the insurer to reimburse costs incurred because of subcontractor default.

Construction counsel must understand the differences between traditional performance bonds and SDI insurance, the pros and cons of SDI coverage, and whether SDI is a viable risk mitigation vehicle for a particular client or project.

Additionally, construction counsel must be able to advise clients on steps to take to mitigate some of the potential pitfalls of SDI policies, including maximizing coverage and streamlining the claims process.

Listen as our authoritative panel of practitioners guides you through the pros and cons of subcontractor default insurance, the differences between SDI and surety bonds, and best practices to maximize SDI coverage and streamline the claim process.

1. Overview of SDI coverage vs. performance surety bonds
2. Pros and cons of SDI policies
3. Maximizing SDI coverage
4. Streamlining the claims process

The panel will review these and other key issues:

• What are the key advantages of SDI, and what are the drawbacks that must be considered?
• How do construction lenders view SDI policies as an alternative to performance bonds?
• What steps can construction managers take to maximize SDI coverage and streamline the claim process?