Healthcare Regulation After Loper Bright and Corner Post: Maintaining Compliance in a Post-Chevron World

This CLE webinar will examine the healthcare regulatory landscape since the notable U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the long-standing Chevron doctrine, and Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which expanded the time period during which plaintiffs may challenge agency rules. The panel will discuss the impact these decisions have had on healthcare regulation, judicial interpretation, and agency challenges; examine administrative policy shifts; and offer best practices for compliance in a post-Chevron world.

Two notable U.S. Supreme Court decisions were anticipated to have a significant impact on healthcare regulation—Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the Chevron doctrine, and Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which expanded the time period during which plaintiffs may challenge agency rules, allowing rule challenges even years after implementation. 

In an industry highly regulated by federal agencies such as HHS, FDA, and CMS, counsel should understand how these decisions have affected healthcare regulation and judicial interpretation over the past one + years, which healthcare rules are or may be susceptible to being challenged, and how to help their clients remain compliant in a post-Chevron world.

Listen as our expert panel examines the impact that the Loper Bright and Corner Post decisions have had on healthcare regulation, judicial interpretation, and agency rule challenges. The panel will discuss administrative policy shifts and offer best practices for compliance.