BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • card_travel Commercial Law
  • schedule 90 minutes

MAC Clauses and Indemnification Provisions in M&A Deals: Recent Trends in Negotiating and Drafting

Implications of Recent Deal Litigation on the Negotiation of MAC Clauses

$347.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

CLE
ALL
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack
BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

MAE clauses, which permit the cancellation of a deal under certain circumstances, are intensely negotiated and frequently litigated provisions in M&A transactions. Questions about what constitutes a MAC have been at the center of several disputed deals.

Counsel's failure to anticipate and address potential MAEs and risks during the structuring of a deal can result in unintended legal and financial exposure for buyers and sellers. Further, the failure to coordinate the MAC clause with the representations and warranties clauses and other essential provisions in the acquisition agreement can create several problems.

In addition to MAE clauses, this program will address indemnification provisions in a private company M&A transaction, including current trends in survival periods, basket amounts, indemnity caps, and sandbagging provisions. Indemnification provisions are often the most critical risk allocation provisions in a private company M&A transaction.

Listen as our authoritative panel discusses current trends surrounding the use and interpretation of MAE clauses in M&A deals, strategies for negotiating and drafting the terms, and negotiating and drafting indemnification provisions.

Presented By

Kenneth W. W. Clingen
Partner
Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC

Mr. Clingen chairs the firm’s business counseling department. He is general counsel to a number of privately owned businesses across a variety of industries and also represents high net worth individuals and family offices. He counsels clients in starting new business ventures, operating their ongoing business enterprises and preparing business succession plans for business owners.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Robert T. Miller
F. Arnold Daum Chair in Corporate Finance and Law
Univ of Iowa College of Law

Before joining the faculty at the University of Iowa College of Law, Professor Miller was a Professor of Law at the Villanova University School of Law and the Associate Director of the Matthew J. Ryan Center for the Study of Free Institutions and the Public Good at Villanova University. He has been a Visiting Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, a Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at the Cardozo Law School, and an Olin Fellow in Law and Economics at the Columbia Law School. Before entering academia, Professor Miller was an associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York. His scholarship concerns corporate and securities law, the economic analysis of law, and the philosophy of law, and he has taught courses in Business Associations, Mergers and Acquisitions, Securities Regulation, Law and Economics, Corporate Finance, Antitrust, Contracts, Deals, and Capitalism.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, April 12, 2023

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. MAE clauses
    1. Overview of the concept of a "material adverse effect"
    2. Provisions where the concept appears
      1. Absence of interim changes representation
      2. Qualifying certain representations
      3. Free-standing "No MAE" closing condition
      4. Bringdown of other representations to an MAE
    3. The MAE definition
      1. The base definition
        1. Underlying predicate events
        2. Expectation and aggregation language
        3. Uncapitalized "material adverse effect"
        4. MAE objects
      2. Exceptions
        1. Systematic risks
        2. Indicator risks
        3. Agreement risks
      3. Disproportionality exclusions
    4. Misunderstandings, mistakes, and pitfalls
      1. Events and effects
      2. Breadth of excepted events
      3. The known risk fallacy
      4. The control group in the disproportionality exclusion
    5. MAEs in contractual provisions reconsidered
      1. Absence of interim changes representation
      2. Qualifying certain representations
      3. Free-standing "No MAE" closing condition
      4. Bringdown of other representations to an MAE
  2. Negotiating indemnification provisions in private company M&A transactions
    1. "Sandbagging"
    2. Survival periods
      1. General survival periods
      2. Exceptions to general survival periods
    3. Scope of indemnifiable damages
      1. Importance of "loss" definition
    4. Indemnification deductibles ("baskets")
      1. Mini-baskets
      2. Tipping basket vs. true deductible
      3. Basket carve-outs
      4. Baskets as percentage of transaction value
    5. Materiality scrapes
    6. Indemnification caps
      1. Caps as a percentage of transaction value
      2. Exceptions to caps
        1. Importance of fraud definition
    7. Third-party indemnification claims
      1. Control of defense
      2. Exceptions to indemnitor's control of defense
    8. Indemnification as exclusive remedy
    9. Indemnification escrows
      1. Escrows as a percentage of transaction value
    10. Reductions against buyer's indemnification claims
      1. Reduction for tax benefits
      2. Reduction for insurance proceeds
      3. Duty to mitigate
    11. Representations and warranties insurance
      1. When appropriate
      2. Underwriting process
      3. Effect on indemnification

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How has recent deal litigation impacted the negotiation of MAE clauses?
  • How can counsel for buyers and sellers best mitigate risk when drafting and negotiating MAC clauses?
  • What are the current trends to consider when drafting and negotiating indemnification provisions?
  • How has representation and warranty insurance affected indemnification provisions?