Thank you!
The full article is available below.
You will also receive a follow-up email containing a link so you can come back to it later.

The Two Rules
Whether the phrase uses the word “and” or the word “but,” the following two rules are expressed:
- A will attend the party if B attends: B → A
- A will attend the party only if B attends: A → B
These two rules can be concisely expressed together with a double arrow:
A ↔ B
The Contrapositives
As discussed in the PowerScore LSAT Logical Reasoning Bible, the contrapositives of the two statements above are as follows:
- If A does not attend the party, B will not attend: NOT A → NOT B
- If B does not attend the party, A will not attend: NOT B → NOT A
Again, the two contrapositives can be expressed more concisely with a double arrow:
NOT A ↔ NOT B
In the end, this rule tells us that either both A and B will be at the party, or neither one will be there.
P.S. If a future LSAT game happens to include the rule “C will attend if, yet only if, D attends,” don’t be thrown off! Recognize this as just another clever rephrasing of the very same rule.
More on Conditional Diagramming
Unlock the Full Article
Bring Your Goals Within ReachTell us a little about yourself and your goals to display the full article and gain access to more resources relevant to your needs.
Interested in reading more? Fill out the form to read the full article.
Ready for test day success?
Take the next step towards complete LSAT mastery and reach your full score potential with PowerScore’s collection of LSAT prep tools.