Correlations and Causal Reasoning on the LSAT Part I

Thank you!

The full article is available below.

You will also receive a follow-up email containing a link so you can come back to it later.

Breadcrumb
LSAT Prep Logical Reasoning

Correlation & Causal Relationships

In statistics, “correlation” refers to a statistical relationship between two interdependent variables (e.g. height and weight, studying and grades, etc.). A correlation alone does not prove a causal relationship, but it can suggest that a causal relationship does, in fact, exist. For instance, you cannot interpret a correlation between height and weight to mean that either one causes the other. On the other hand, a correlation between studying and grades implies that studying causes higher grades. Still, the correlation alone is not sufficient to prove that such a causal relationship exists.

An empirically observable correlation between two interdependent variables is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for causality.

Explanation

On the LSAT, correlations usually function as evidence presented in support of a causal conclusion:

Premise: A and B are correlated

Conclusion: A causes B

Usually, the problem with such arguments is the presumption that correlation proves causation. It does not, as there could be some third factor that could explain (i.e., provide a causal explanation for) the observed correlation, or other means of interpreting the relationship.

Example

An example of a typical causal argument involving a correlation:

Scientists have long suspected that isoflavones, a class of biologically active organic compounds, tend to improve one’s cognitive performance. Now these views have acquired strong support from a recent study showing that college students who took soy isoflavone supplements for 3 months did significantly better on various reasoning tasks than students who never took such supplements.

The structure of the argument is as follows:

Premise: Soy isoflavone supplementation is correlated with improved cognitive performance.

Conclusion: Soy isoflavone supplementation causes an improvement in cognitive performance.

Consider Why the Correlation May Not Be Sufficient

When analyzing such arguments, it’s important to consider why the correlation may not be sufficient to establish the causal conclusion. The problem is usually with the way in which the study was controlled. For instance, if the students examined were not randomly assigned to each group, this would imply a selection bias in the experimental group and compromise the validity of the conclusion. Indeed, if those who are particularly ambitious tend to take performance-enhancing supplements, they also tend to do better on various reasoning tasks than their less-ambitious counterparts. So a third factor could explain the correlation between isoflavone supplementation and performance, causing both the “cause” and the “effect.”

Eliminate Bias

To eliminate the possibility of bias, it may also be important to conduct a double-blind study in which neither the students nor the researchers know who belongs to the control group and who belongs to the experimental group until after all data have been recorded. Without a double-blind study, it is possible that the correlation is a function of a placebo effect or of the experimenters’ own subjective bias towards the result they expect.

The following question types typically follow arguments that follow this pattern of reasoning:

  1. Weaken
  2. Strengthen
  3. Assumption
  4. Flaw in the Reasoning

Part II of this blog article will examine how each of these question types tests your ability to understand the difference between correlations and causations and provide examples of several correct and incorrect answer choices for each question type. Stay tuned!

Continue Reading

Unlock the Full Article

Bring Your Goals Within Reach

Tell us a little about yourself and your goals to display the full article and gain access to more resources relevant to your needs.

Interested in reading more? Fill out the form to read the full article.

BarbriLifecycleContent

Ready for test day success?

Take the next step towards complete LSAT mastery and reach your full score potential with PowerScore’s collection of LSAT prep tools.

BarbriResourceCenterAdditionalResources