BarbriSFCourseDetails
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack

Course Details

Course Information
  • smart_display Format

    On-Demand

  • signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level

  • work Practice Area

    Class Action and Other Litigation

Date & Time
  • event Date

    Wednesday, August 19, 2020

  • schedule Time

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  • timer Program Length

    90 minutes

Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.

$297.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

CLE
ALL

This CLE course will provide advanced techniques for deposing adverse expert witnesses in class action certification litigation, with particular focus on establishing or attacking predominance.

Faculty

Andrew J. Trask
Senior Counsel
Shook Hardy & Bacon

Mr. Trask focuses his practice on class action and complex litigation in various industries, including the automotive industry and financial services. Regarded as an authority in class action litigation, he has experience in class actions involving product liability, consumer fraud, telecommunications products, business litigation and contracts, banking, securities, ERISA, antitrust and environmental claims. He also has defended mass tort cases involving financial regulations, as well as government investigations and data breach matters. 

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Blake Bailey
Owner
Bailey Law Firm

Mr. Bailey has tried to conclusion almost 150 jury trials, and has had an extremely high success rate throughout his career. He has been awarded as much as $20 million for his clients in a single jury verdict. Mr. Bailey is a champion of the rights of those injured or killed by negligence or unreasonably dangerous products. He is also an expert in defending those who are victims of bad faith on the part of insurance companies.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio

Description

The complex issue of predominance often determines the winner in the battle for class certification. Whether some or all the elements of a plaintiff’s claims are susceptible to common proof is increasingly decided on expert testimony.

With certification often won, lost, or reversed by expert witnesses, the expert's deposition is the crucial battleground. Yet even experienced litigators can be stymied deposing an expert with a deep level of expertise in complicated subject matter and vast experience in being questioned by adverse counsel.

Often, seasoned lawyers fail to get the information they need from the opponent's expert because they attempt to debate the expert deponent concerning the subject of the expert's opinion. This presentation will prepare litigators for a deposition with lines of questions that will reveal weaknesses in the expert's opinion without tipping off the expert and how to advance the examiner's case.

Listen as this experienced panel of class action practitioners discusses best practices and tactics for taking control of the deposition, setting up the expert for impeachment at trial, challenging the expert's methodology, and gaining the upper hand in settlement negotiations.

Outline

  1. Preparing for the deposition
    1. Determining what must be proven to certify the class
    2. Jurisdictional standards for using expert testimony at certification stage
    3. Researching the expert's opinions and prior testimony
  2. Deposing the expert
    1. Limiting the scope of expert's area of expertise
    2. Getting opposing expert to deviate from the theme
    3. Developing topics for cross-examination at trial
    4. Exposing personal biases
    5. Focusing on what the expert did not consider
    6. Appropriate methodologies and correct application
    7. How to effectively use experts' analyses to address manageability of a class action trial

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What constitutes "rigorous analysis" of expert testimony by a district court?
  • What are the most complex expert deposition hurdles, and how to overcome them?
  • How to attack the expert's methodology
  • Limiting the scope of an expert's area of expertise
  • Getting the opposing expert to deviate from the party's theme