BarbriSFCourseDetails

Course Details

This CLE course will guide counsel through the unique challenges when someone seeks to depose a high-ranking executive, such as Chairman of the Board, CEO, President, etc. The panelist will discuss the best strategies for preventing abuse of such depositions in federal and state courts and those needing to depose this distinct category of "apex" witnesses.

Faculty

Description

Attorneys who represent companies, especially those companies with layers of management, must know how to protect their executives, such as CEOs, from spurious depositions or from being called to testify in perhaps scores of lawsuits on many different types of claims. In seeking to limit or quash the deposition of senior executives, courts focus on the deponent's unique personal knowledge and whether the relevant information can be obtained through less onerous methods.

Nonetheless, discovery is broad, and in cases involving decisions made at the highest level that affect the company's performance and profit, top-level executives (apex witnesses) may very well have unique personal knowledge sufficient to justify taking a deposition.

Counsel must prepare the apex witness for questions that assume knowledge that the witness does not have and balance all the strategic considerations of trial when deciding how to approach these depositions.

Listen as Philip J. Mohr, Partner at Womble Bond Dickinson (US), discusses the best strategies for preventing abuse of such depositions in federal and state court and best strategies for those needing to depose this distinct category of "apex" witnesses.

Outline

  1. What makes apex depositions different
  2. Strategies for parties deposing the apex witness
  3. Limiting or quashing the deposition
    1. Procedure
    2. Types of cases where apex witnesses required
  4. Preparing the apex witness

Benefits

The panelist will review these and other pivotal issues:

  • Should in-house or outside counsel manage the executive witness?
  • What strategies exist for assisting an executive who is not a good witness?
  • Will disclaiming knowledge of certain topics create credibility problems in court or the marketplace?