Welcome to BARBRI, the trusted global leader in legal education. Continue to access the same expert-led Strafford CLE and CPE webinars you know and value. Plus, explore professional skills courses and more.
About the Course
Introduction
This CLE course will provide guidance to patent counsel on navigating the inter partes review (IPR) process for challenging design patents. The panel will provide insight into the issues the PTAB considers essential when determining whether to institute IPRs of design patents. The panel will also discuss the prior art and obviousness analyses.
Description
Companies are looking to design patents as a way to protect their IP. The nature of design patents make challenging them in IPR or post-grant review (PGR) desirable. However, challenging design patents in AIA proceedings is very different from challenging utility patents.
Unlike utility patents, design patent applications are rarely rejected during examination. As a result, a petition for IPR or PGR presents the first attempt by PTAB to apply prior art to a design patent. Similarly, the obviousness analysis for design patents is also unique.
IPR provides a less expensive avenue to challenge the validity of a design patent. In understanding the unique issues present with design patents, patent counsel can make a strong case to challenge a design patent that may infringe on the client's preexisting patent or challenge the validity of a preexisting design patent.
Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys discusses the unique characteristics of design patents and why challenging design patents in IPR is desirable. The panel will also provide insight into the issues the PTAB considers essential when determining whether to institute IPRs of design patents. The panel will discuss the prior art and obviousness analyses and offer guidance on navigating the IPR process.
Presented By
Ms. Durkin is the practice leader of the firm’s Mechanical & Design Practice Group. With more than 35 years of experience obtaining and enforcing IP rights, she is sought out by leading consumer product companies and by colleagues around the world for her deep understanding of utility and design patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Ms. Durkin is the Vice Chair of the USPTO’s Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC), which advises the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property on the policies, goals, performance, budget, and user fees of patent operations at the Office. She is also the chair of the Designs Committee for the INTA. Ms. Durkin is past chair of the Industrial Designs Committee of the IP Section of the ABA and of the Industrial Designs Committee of the American Intellectual Property Law Association. In addition, she is past vice chair of the Industrial Designs Committee of the Intellectual Property Owners Association. Ms. Durkin has been an Adjunct Professor of Law at George Mason University Law School in Virginia and has spoken internationally on topics such as the interplay between design patents and trade dress, protection of graphical user interface designs and the user experience, The Hague Agreement, trademark co-branding and licensing, IP audits and mediation. Additionally, she co-hosts the biennial Design Law Conference, which aims to foster debate on cutting-edge design-related topics.
Ms. Ferrill focuses her practice on all aspects of design patents, including prosecution, counseling, and litigation. She also has extensive experience in utility patent litigation in the areas of software- and hardware-related technologies. She counsels clients who hold design patents as well as those accused of infringement. She has experience with consumer and industrial products, graphical user interfaces and icons. She has prosecuted families of design patents before the USPTO, directed prosecution in foreign countries, and argued appeals before the PTAB.
Ms. Horn combines her extensive knowledge of Patent Office practice with her experience as a patent litigator to help clients build, assert, and defend strategic portfolios of utility and design patents. She helps clients with patent prosecution, non-infringement and invalidity analyses, written opinions, and pre-litigation diligence as a patent agent upon registration before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). She maintains an active patent prosecution and counseling practice, assisting clients with building strategic portfolios of utility and design patents worldwide. She helps clients assert and defend patent infringement claims before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and in U.S. district courts. Her technical experience spans a broad range of technologies.
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
-
Live Online
On Demand
Date + Time
- event
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
- schedule
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- Advantages and limitations of IPR for design patents
- Issues the PTAB considers critical when determining whether to institute IPRs of design patents
- Prior art analysis
- Obviousness analysis
- Guidance for navigating the IPR process
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What are the advantages of IPR for design patents? What are the limitations?
- What challenges arise in AIA proceedings as a result of the unique characteristics of design patents? What steps can counsel take to overcome these challenges?
- What is the test to determine obviousness for design patents in AIA proceedings?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Unlimited access to Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses:
- Annual access
- Available on-demand
- Best for new attorneys
Related Courses
Advice of Counsel Defense in Patent Litigation and Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege
Thursday, April 16, 2026
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
EU Unitary Patent System and UPC: Recent Decisions and Developments
Tuesday, April 7, 2026
1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT