Design Patents and IPR: Challenging and Defending Validity at the PTAB
Navigating Prior Art and Obviousness Analyses, Leveraging IPR for Design Patents

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
- work Practice Area
Patent
- event Date
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE course will provide guidance to patent counsel on navigating the inter partes review (IPR) process for challenging design patents. The panel will provide insight into the issues the PTAB considers essential when determining whether to institute IPRs of design patents. The panel will also discuss the prior art and obviousness analyses.
Faculty

Ms. Durkin heads the firm’s Mechanical and Design Patent Group. With nearly 30 years of experience obtaining and enforcing IP rights, she has a deep understanding of utility and design patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Ms. Durkin has been an Adjunct Professor at George Mason University Law School and has spoken internationally on topics such as the interplay between design patents and trade dress, and protection of user interface and the user experience. She is currently a Vice Chair of the Industrial Designs Committee of IP Section of the ABA.

Ms. Horn combines her extensive knowledge of Patent Office practice with her experience as a patent litigator to help clients build, assert, and defend strategic portfolios of utility and design patents. She helps clients with patent prosecution, non-infringement and invalidity analyses, written opinions, and pre-litigation diligence as a patent agent upon registration before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). She maintains an active patent prosecution and counseling practice, assisting clients with building strategic portfolios of utility and design patents worldwide. She helps clients assert and defend patent infringement claims before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and in U.S. district courts. Her technical experience spans a broad range of technologies.

Ms. Ferrill focuses her practice on all aspects of design patents, including prosecution, counseling, and litigation. She also has extensive experience in utility patent litigation in the areas of software- and hardware-related technologies. She counsels clients who hold design patents as well as those accused of infringement. She has experience with consumer and industrial products, graphical user interfaces and icons. She has prosecuted families of design patents before the USPTO, directed prosecution in foreign countries, and argued appeals before the PTAB.Â
Description
Companies are looking to design patents as a way to protect their IP. The nature of design patents make challenging them in IPR or post-grant review (PGR) desirable. However, challenging design patents in AIA proceedings is very different from challenging utility patents.
Unlike utility patents, design patent applications are rarely rejected during examination. As a result, a petition for IPR or PGR presents the first attempt by PTAB to apply prior art to a design patent. Similarly, the obviousness analysis for design patents is also unique.
IPR provides a less expensive avenue to challenge the validity of a design patent. In understanding the unique issues present with design patents, patent counsel can make a strong case to challenge a design patent that may infringe on the client's preexisting patent or challenge the validity of a preexisting design patent.
Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys discusses the unique characteristics of design patents and why challenging design patents in IPR is desirable. The panel will also provide insight into the issues the PTAB considers essential when determining whether to institute IPRs of design patents. The panel will discuss the prior art and obviousness analyses and offer guidance on navigating the IPR process.
Outline
- Advantages and limitations of IPR for design patents
- Issues the PTAB considers critical when determining whether to institute IPRs of design patents
- Prior art analysis
- Obviousness analysis
- Guidance for navigating the IPR process
Benefits
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What are the advantages of IPR for design patents? What are the limitations?
- What challenges arise in AIA proceedings as a result of the unique characteristics of design patents? What steps can counsel take to overcome these challenges?
- What is the test to determine obviousness for design patents in AIA proceedings?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Related Courses

Patent Design Arounds for Both Utility and Design Patents: Minimizing Risk of Infringement, Reducing Likelihood of Competitor Design Arounds, and Maximizing the Chances of Covering Competitors’ Attempted Design Arounds When Preparing a Patent Application
Wednesday, May 28, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Patent Infringement: Structuring Opinions of Counsel
Friday, May 23, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Means-Plus-Function Patent Claims Following Xencor: Preamble, Written Description, and More
Thursday, May 15, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT