NEPA Implementation After the Marin Audubon Society Ruling: Enforceability of CEQ Rules, Impact of New Administration

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Environmental
- event Date
Tuesday, February 4, 2025
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE webinar will discuss the D.C. Circuit's unexpected Nov. 12, 2024, decision in Marin Audubon Society v. Federal Aviation Administration and its potential implications for federal environmental review processes. Our panel will explore the ramifications of this decision for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementation and the future role of the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) NEPA regulations.
Faculty

Mr. Cruden provides strategic counsel on high-stakes environmental and natural resources litigation, civil and criminal enforcement, and compliance. Working with clients makes the practice of law worthy and valuable to him as they advance strategic needs while protecting human health and the environment. Mr. Cruden is the Past Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Past President of Environmental Law Institute, Past President of American College of Environmental Lawyers, and Past Chair of ABA Section on Environment, Energy, and Resources.

Mr. Rusk specializes in project permitting, compliance and litigation involving endangered species, wetlands and water quality, and related environmental review requirements. He guides landowners and developers through the complex permitting and compliance processes under federal and state natural resources laws, including the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the California Fish and Wildlife Code and Porter-Cologne Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act. He also represents clients in litigation defending federal and state permits against challenge by project opponents, and in suits challenging arbitrary agency action. Mr. Rusk has established strong working relationships with staff at the Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Boards and U.S. Department of Justice. His areas of expertise also include California water rights, federal Indian law, and the USDA's National Organic Program.

Mr. Johnson serves clients in a wide range of infrastructure and natural resource contexts, both by guiding them past regulatory and environmental review obstacles to win agency approvals and by litigating the complex issues that often arise in such contexts. He focuses on projects that attract scrutiny from both regulators and third-party groups, including mining, rail and surface transportation, and port projects. Mr. Johnson has briefed and argued dozens of cases in trial and appellate courts around the country. He also successfully petitioned for U.S. Supreme Court review as counsel of record in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, which the Court will hear during its October 2024 term. Throughout his career, Mr. Johnson has defended favorable agency decisions by making arguments that government attorneys may be unable or unwilling to make. One of his appellate briefs is featured in a new book, Level Up Your Legal Writing by Joe Regalia (Aspen Publishing, 2024).

Ms. Macdonald focuses her practice on environmental litigation, environmental due diligence and transactional matters, environmental impact review, and land use issues. She has litigated multi-million dollar claims for recovery of remediation costs under the Superfund Law (CERCLA) in federal courts in New York, New Jersey (pro hac vice) and Ohio (pro hac vice), and has also represented clients in administrative proceedings before the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and New York City Environmental Control Board. Ms. Macdonald has significant experience with electronic discovery in complex, multi-party litigations, and leverages technology to efficiently meet her clients’ needs. In addition, she works with clients involved in the recycling and solid waste management industries to establish environmentally-responsible business practices and comply with product stewardship regulations.
Description
In Marin Audubon Society, despite neither party having raised or briefed the issue, a three-judge panel held 2-1 that the CEQ lacks the authority to issue binding regulations under NEPA. This decision raises critical questions about the validity of existing NEPA regulations and other agency actions taken under the CEQ framework, as well as the procedural requirements for federal agencies moving forward. If the decision is not overturned by a full en banc appellate panel or by the U.S. Supreme Court, it could significantly alter the landscape of NEPA review. How the incoming Trump administration will address CEQ's regulatory authority also remains to be seen.
After the court's holding in Marin Audubon Society, federal agencies face a raft of legal issues concerning their reliance on the CEQ regulations and the unavailability of Chevron deference after Loper Bright, making individual agencies' NEPA regulations and project-specific NEPA compliance vulnerable to challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Listen as our authoritative panel provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of the court's decision, its immediate impact on NEPA processes, and the broader implications for environmental law practitioners. The panel will also discuss how this ruling affects federal agency actions, the potential for increased litigation, and strategies for navigating the evolving regulatory environment.
Outline
- Background: Marin Audubon Society v. FAA
- D.C. Circuit ruling and the case's future in the courts
- Implications for NEPA implementation
- Future role of the CEQ
- Practical takeaways
Benefits
The panel will address these and other key considerations:
- Implications of the Marin Audubon Society decision
- Practical strategies for navigating NEPA compliance in light of the court's ruling
- Potential risks and uncertainties introduced by the decision and how to mitigate them
- Potential legislative and administrative responses to the ruling
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Related Courses

CERCLA Liability and Reopened Superfund Sites: PRP Impact, Settlement Consequences, Insurance Considerations
Thursday, April 10, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

PFAS 2025 Update: Regulatory and Scientific Developments, Increasing Litigation, Insurance Issues
Tuesday, May 27, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Introduction to Environmental Litigation: Key Litigation Strategies, Regulatory Frameworks, and Common Challenges
Monday, April 28, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
Transforming CLE from a Requirement to a Career Advantage
- Learning & Development
- Career Advancement
- Talent Development
How to Build a Standout Personal Brand Without Sacrificing Billable Hours
- Career Advancement