Prosecution History Estoppel in Patent Litigation: Avoiding the Presumption, Limitation of Doctrine of Equivalents

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
- work Practice Area
Patent
- event Date
Thursday, May 27, 2021
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE course will guide patent litigators on prosecution history estoppel and when it applies. The panel will discuss the exceptions and the guidance provided by the courts in recent decisions. The panel will review strategies to avoid the presumption of estoppel while getting the desired claim allowed.
Faculty

Dr. Noonan's practice involves all aspects of patent prosecution, interferences, and litigation. He represents pharmaceutical companies both large and small on a myriad of issues, as well as several universities in both patenting and licensing to outside investors. Dr. Noonan also has over 20 years of experience as a molecular biologist, and is a founding author of the Patent Docs weblog, which focuses on biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent law. He has also filed amicus briefs to district courts, the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court involving patenting issues relevant to biotechnology.

As a Co-Chair of the firm’s Appellate Practice, Ms. Hughey is one of the firm’s appellate specialists. She is a former Federal Circuit law clerk, has handled dozens of appeals, and has argued before the Federal Circuit both as the appellant and the appellee. In addition, Ms. Hughey leverages her appellate experience by consulting on appellate cases throughout the firm, for other firms, and for her clients. As a thought leader, she writes extensively on current legal issues and is the author of a law review article on effective appellate advocacy before the Federal Circuit.

Mr. Jakes concentrates his practice on patent litigation and related counseling. He serves as lead counsel in federal district courts and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), before arbitration panels, and on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He deals mainly with computer, electronics, semiconductor, software, and medical device technologies. He has vast experience at the Federal Circuit, having argued more than 45 appeals and prepared and filed briefs in many more. He has served as both a special master and technical advisor to various U.S. district courts, assisting with claim construction and summary judgment motions on patents covering a wide variety of subjects.
Description
Prosecution history estoppel can play an important role in patent litigation. Patent litigators must understand the scope of the estoppel as well as when it applies. The Supreme Court held that under the doctrine of equivalents, an accused product or process that does not literally include every limitation of an asserted patent claim can still infringe the claim if it includes an equivalent of the missing limitation. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem Co. (1997).
The presumption of estoppel arises when a claim is amended to overcome a rejection. Once there is a presumption of estoppel it is difficult to overcome. For estoppel to be triggered, the claim amendment must have been made for the claim to be patentable and must narrow the claim. It is important to know when an amendment is considered to be narrowing.
The case law is complicated and not always clear. Counsel must understand how the courts have treated prosecution history estoppel and when the courts have allowed some claims.
Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines prosecution history estoppel. The panel will discuss the exceptions when they apply and the courts' guidance in recent decisions. The panel will review strategies to avoid the presumption of estoppel while getting the desired claim allowed.
Outline
- Prosecution history estoppel
- When it applies
- Limiting the use of equivalents to expand protection
- Exceptions
- Recent court treatment
- Best practices for avoiding or overcoming the presumption
Benefits
The panel will review these and other important issues:
- What are the criteria for rebuttal of the presumption of estoppel?
- How have the courts addressed the application of prosecution history estoppel?
- What options are available to avoid the presumption of prosecution history estoppel?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Related Courses

Patent Design Arounds for Both Utility and Design Patents: Minimizing Risk of Infringement, Reducing Likelihood of Competitor Design Arounds, and Maximizing the Chances of Covering Competitors’ Attempted Design Arounds When Preparing a Patent Application
Wednesday, May 28, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Patent Infringement: Structuring Opinions of Counsel
Friday, May 23, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Means-Plus-Function Patent Claims Following Xencor: Preamble, Written Description, and More
Thursday, May 15, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT