BarbriSFCourseDetails
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack

Course Details

Course Information
  • smart_display Format

    On-Demand

  • signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level

  • work Practice Area

    Commercial Law

Date & Time
  • event Date

    Thursday, August 5, 2021

  • schedule Time

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  • timer Program Length

    90 minutes

Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.

$347.00
CLE
ALL

This CLE course will examine the features of de-SPAC merger transactions. The panel will discuss deal terms typically negotiated between the SPAC and the target and how they vary from conventional deals. The panel will also analyze the de-SPAC process of taking the target public, including the offering timeline, pricing, and allocation of shares.

Faculty

Natasha Allen
Partner
Foley & Lardner LLP

Ms. Allen is a strategic advisor for her clients, supporting leadership teams in complex decision making. Prior to joining Foley, she was a founding partner at a corporate and transactional law firm, where she counselled startups and emerging companies on debt and equity financing, venture capital financing, commercial matters and general corporate matters including formations, corporate governance, structuring and share issuances across a variety of industries including AI, fintech, robotics and life sciences. Ms. Allen’s transactional experience includes mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, including domestic and cross-border buy-side and sell-side transactions in AR/VR, software, cybersecurity, telecommunications and healthcare industries. She draws on a depth of experience developed in a combination of law firms, business consulting firms and startups in both Canada and the U.S. She was previously managing counsel at a technology enabled law firm where in addition to her management role, she acted as external general counsel for clients from inception through exit.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Brandee L. Diamond
Partner
Foley & Lardner LLP

Ms. Diamond provides legal advice to investors, corporate boards, and public and private companies in a range of industries including life sciences, technology, food and beverage, apparel, print and digital media and financial services. She has extensive experience with complex domestic and cross-border transactions, corporate mergers and acquisitions, dispositions, minority investments, joint ventures and assisting with growth equity transactions, leveraged buyouts, going-private transactions, recapitalizations and exits. Ms. Diamond works in all aspects of the deal process including working with corporate boards and senior management on pre-acquisition planning, transaction structuring, drafting and negotiating acquisition, and related agreements and post-acquisition integration planning. In addition to her transactional work, she counsels emerging growth companies across the full spectrum of the company’s lifecycle including formation and development, compensation, financing and other corporate matters.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio

Description

De-SPAC transactions are usually structured as mergers of the target company with the SPAC, but SPAC deal terms vary significantly from standard M&A deals. The capital structure of the merged entity will depend on how many SPAC shareholders elect to participate or redeem their shares. Since a SPAC will take a private company public through a merger, the private operating company will need to comply with securities law disclosure requirements. Deal counsel must address all of these issues in the de-SPAC merger process.

Among the key terms negotiated in the merger agreement are the valuation of the target company (and any earn-out or price adjustments), the form of consideration (stock, cash, or a combination), recourse to the target company, “fiduciary outs” and termination fees, and other terms. SPAC M&A terms continue to evolve, so counsel will need an awareness of what is "market."

As a condition to closing, a target company may require the SPAC to have a minimum amount of cash available after any redemption of the SPAC's shareholders at closing. SPACs can raise capital through PIPEs to ensure there is cash available. Target companies will want to include provisions in the merger agreement that ensure sufficient committed PIPE financing available.

While there are certain advantages to pursuing a de-SPAC transaction as opposed to an IPO, the SEC has recently indicated it intends to review target company disclosures to the same extent as those provided in an IPO. The SEC will carefully review the disclosures by SPACs and target companies in the proxy or registration statement, including the projections and valuations contained in these filings.

Listen as our authoritative panel discusses these and other issues counsel must consider in negotiating and closing a de-SPAC merger.

Outline

  1. The de-SPAC merger: typical structure
  2. How de-SPAC merger terms vary from standard M&A transactions
  3. Options for existing SPAC shareholders: warrants, redemption
  4. Need for cash after closing: PIPEs
  5. Securities disclosure issues with taking the target public and increased SEC scrutiny

Benefits

The panel will review these and other concerns:

  • What issues should be considered upfront before a SPAC proceeds to make an offer on a target company?
  • What is the result of de-SPAC transactions for securities law purposes, and how does that affect the process?
  • How do de-SPAC merger deal terms vary from most M&A transactions?
  • How can PIPE financing facilitate closing?