BarbriSFCourseDetails
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack

Course Details

Course Information
  • smart_display Format

    On-Demand

  • signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level

  • work Practice Area

    Commercial Law

Date & Time
  • event Date

    Tuesday, October 12, 2021

  • schedule Time

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  • timer Program Length

    90 minutes

Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.

$297.00
CLE
ALL

This CLE course will guide business counsel through legal concerns in negotiating termination and suspension provisions contained in commercial contracts drafted in a pre-pandemic world, as well as the considerations for such provisions in the post-pandemic economic environment. The panel will discuss other considerations and means of limiting liability and damages.

Faculty

Vanessa L. Miller
Partner
Foley & Lardner LLP

Ms. Miller’s practice focuses on general manufacturing breach of contract and warranty disputes, automotive supply chain disputes, product liability lawsuits, trade secret claims, and business torts. Ms. Miller defends consumer class actions involving claims of breach of contract, breach of warranty, fraud, negligence, and unjust enrichment. Ms. Miller also routinely counsels clients on various commercial contract documents and supply chain issues. She is a member of the firm’s Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution Practice, Automotive Industry Team and Manufacturing Industry Team.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Matthew Lakind
Attorney
Tesser & Cohen

Mr. Lakind's practice focuses on construction law including construction defect litigation, Consumer Fraud Act claims, equitable adjustment/delay claims, insurance issues related to construction, construction lien law, public bid protests, professional malpractice claims involving design professionals, and negligence/tort claims arising out of construction projects. Mr. Lakind also drafts and negotiates contracts for a wide array of construction projects, including large public and commercial projects, solar power installations under Master Service Agreements, and residential contracts. He handles all aspects of construction related litigation, including trials, depositions, motion hearings, and navigating the discovery process. 

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio

Description

The global pandemic has destabilized all areas of commercial contracting and the supply chain. Counsel must examine default and termination provisions of ongoing and future agreements and learn how to calculate damages for those contracts. Force majeure provisions in commercial contracts are now under the microscope, although the clauses were most likely given little thought at the time of drafting.

If a contract does not include a force majeure clause, a party may raise the defense of impossibility or impracticality. Under the Restatement (Second) of Contracts 261, a party can discharge a contractual obligation when "performance is made impracticable without his fault by the occurrence ... or the non-occurrence of [an event] which was a basic assumption on which the contract was made." Experience from the pandemic may allow counsel to anticipate what is possible and practicable in ongoing and future agreements.

Many businesses, particularly if thinly capitalized, are experiencing cash flow challenges. Agreements frequently include provisions that a default and termination occurs when one party files bankruptcy. Parties should carefully weigh whether to exercise early-stage insolvency-related termination rights if the counter-party experiences short-term cash flow problems. Entering contracts with new suppliers on healthier financial footing may prove more difficult, time-consuming, and costly.

The underlying economics of a fixed-price agreement made before the pandemic are fundamentally different now if change-in-law relief is not available and force majeure relief does not cover a party's COVID19-related losses and increased expenses. Parties may instead prefer to seek equitable relief to mitigate losses, such as extending the time for performance or orders of restitution.

Listen as our expert panel provides practical strategies for drafting and negotiating termination provisions of future commercial agreements to ensure clarity in issues of force majeure, the impossibility of performance, and damages to mitigate risks.

Outline

  1. Termination provisions generally
    1. Triggering events
    2. Default provisions
  2. Force majeure
  3. Impossibility/frustration of purpose
  4. Insolvency
  5. Damages
    1. Increased costs
    2. Equitable relief
    3. Other damages

Benefits

The panel will review these and other relevant topics:

  • What triggering events and provisions should an attorney consider when drafting a commercial agreement?
  • How can counsel tailor force majeure provisions in agreements during COVID-19?
  • When does impossibility or frustration of purpose arise in the performance of a commercial agreement?
  • How can damages be assessed in termination provisions to include the added costs of performance due to delays?
  • When and how should parties seek equitable relief in commercial agreements?