BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • card_travel Class Action and Other Litigation
  • schedule 90 minutes

Summary Judgment in Contract Cases: Strategy and Tactics for Movants and Respondents

$297.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

Contract disputes are ideally suited for summary judgment because the interpretation of the contract is a question of law for the court. When a written agreement is clear, complete, and unambiguous it will normally be enforced according to its meaning, but under some circumstances parol evidence may be admissible to help the court construe the contract.

Difficulties can arise when the parties' intent changes over time and when substitutions or adjustments must be made in performance. The attorney who drafted the contract may or may not be able to testify.

Summary judgment is often decided on briefs. Putting the right issues before the court in briefing and oral argument requires thought and planning.

Listen as this stellar panel shares what they have learned from litigating contract cases for decades.

Presented By

Anthony L. Cochran
Partner
Smith Gambrell Russell

Mr. Cochran represents individuals and businesses in a wide variety of matters. He has tried jury trials, bench trials, administrative and regulatory hearings, and medical peer review hearings. He has appeared on many panels and spoken at seminars on a variety of topics, including the application of the Daubert rule and a host of topics related to white-collar criminal law and investigations.

Michael L. Eber
Partner
Smith Gambrell Russell

Mr. Eber is a Partner at SGR whose practice focuses on complex business litigation and appeals. He has significant experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants in arbitration, mediation, and state and federal courts. Mr. Mr. Eber's appellate cases have addressed a broad range of issues, including class certification, constitutional law, securities law, attorneys’ fee awards, insurance coverage, employment, attorney disqualification, and civil procedure. Recently, he argued and won three appeals in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on behalf of business clients seeking to recover damages from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. In the first case, Mr. Eber convinced the Fifth Circuit to vacate the denial of a $4 million claim. After a favorable ruling on remand, the case was settled. In the second case, he defended a $58 million claim, successfully arguing against Lisa Blatt, one of the nation’s most prominent appellate advocates. And in the third case, Mr. Eber won affirmance of a $28 million claim.

Daniel S. Goldstein
Counsel
Smith Gambrell Russell

Mr. Goldstein’s practice focuses on commercial litigation and employment law. He regularly handles cases before state and federal courts, appellate courts, arbitration forums and administrative agencies. He has significant experience litigating complex commercial disputes, and has handled multi-state and cross-border litigations in various jurisdictions including Delaware, California, Florida, Washington D.C., the Netherlands, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, and Israel.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Tuesday, January 31, 2023

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. What is the best way to avoid creating issues of fact?
  2. What are the best types of issues to submit for summary judgment?
  3. What are the best and worst arguments to make on summary judgment in contract cases?
    1. Interpretation of contracts
    2. Ambiguities are the exception, not the rule
    3. Parol evidence rule
    4. Anti-reliance clauses
    5. Creating and rebutting material questions of fact
    6. Burden of proof
      1. In the trial court
      2. On appeal
        1. De novo
        2. Evaluation of trial court's expressed reasoning

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • Evaluating strategic decisions regarding rules of interpretation for a contract
  • Avoiding determination that a contract is ambiguous as a matter of law