• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month May 13, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Personal Injury and Med Mal
  • schedule 90 minutes

Advanced Neuroimaging Evidence in Brain Trauma Cases: Neuroradiology Experts for Diagnosis, Causation, and More

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will discuss advanced neuroimaging evidence in traumatic brain injury (TBI) litigation, the pivotal role of neuroradiologists as consulting and testifying experts, and how to avoid pitfalls when seeking to admit or limit novel or "cutting edge" imaging evidence. The panel will offer insights and best practices for plaintiff and defense-side lawyers.

Description

Because many symptoms and signs of TBI, and their severity, are necessarily self-reported, brain imaging evidence can be particularly significant for determining the existence and extent of damage. Neuroimaging has evolved beyond standard MRI and CT scans, and AI is being integrated into neuroimaging analysis, improving the accuracy and speed of diagnosis.

Neuroradiologists specialize in interpreting detailed imaging studies from the most sensitive technologies, such as susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and functional MRI (fMRI), which can show concussions, diffuse axonal injuries, or micro-hemorrhages not captured by or misinterpreted from MRI or CT scans. DTI is widely recognized as the most sensitive method to identify white matter disruption in the brain, which according to the National Institute of Health, is one of the most common types of TBI. 

Defendants often seek to exclude DTI evidence and neuroradiological testimony under FRE 702 or Daubert, frequently citing lack of standardization or the neuroradiologist's inability to eliminate all alternative causes. Both sides must be aware of and take into account the many potential issues surrounding DTI and other advanced imaging technologies. 

Listen as this expert panel provides a comprehensive review of advanced neuroimaging evidence in TBI litigation; discusses how to admit or exclude neuroradiologist testimony under FRE 702; and outlines how to avoid pitfalls when seeking to admit or limit imaging evidence in TBI cases.

Presented By

Saman Hazany
CEO and Chief Neuroradiology Expert Witness
Neuro Experts, PC

Dr. Hazany is an award-winning, Harvard trained neuroradiologist and concussion/Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) imaging expert in active clinical practice at major academic centers (greater Los Angeles VA,UCLA, and USC).

Bruce H. Stern
Shareholder
Stark & Stark

Mr. Stern is an expert Civil Trial Attorney as certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. He is also a member of the firm’s Accident & Personal Injury practice. Mr. Stern specializes his practice in representing the victims of traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries and wrongful death. In July 2004, Mr. Stern began publishing the Traumatic Brain Injury Law Blog as a way to share his knowledge as a brain injury lawyer. Additionally, he is the author of numerous articles and a frequent lecturer on the subject of traumatic brain injury litigation, evidence and trial techniques. Mr. Stern also co-authored a book entitled “Litigating Brain Injuries” published by Thomson Reuters and a chapter entitled “Brain Injuries” which is included in AAJ’s Litigation Tort Case Series, published by AAJ Press. He is the Treasurer of the North American Brain Injury Society and the past Treasurer of the International Brain Injury Association.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, May 13, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Overview of advanced imaging technologies in TBI cases: CT vs. MRI vs. DTI, FMRI, MEG, PET, EEG

II. Role of neuroradiology experts

III. Diagnosis

IV. Clarifying timelines

V. Causation

VI. Common challenges to neuroradiology experts under FRE 702 or Daubert

VII. Plaintiff strategies and best practices

VIII. Defense strategies and best practices

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • How can the defense use neuroimaging or neuroradiologists to argue "normalcy"?
  • What topics can neuroradiology expert witnesses address in legal testimony?
  • How have the amendments to FRE 702 altered strategies for challenging or admitting neuroradiology expert testimony?