BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • card_travel Bankruptcy
  • schedule 90 minutes

Chapter 11: Limiting Debtor's Business Judgment Under 363 and for Transactions Outside the Ordinary Course

Articulated Business Justification; Totality of the Circumstances; Conflicts With Section 503

$297.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

Transactions outside the ordinary course of business are the lifeblood of Chapter 11. The trustee or debtor-in-possession wishing to sell assets, assume or reject leases, and engage in other transactions must convince the bankruptcy court that the transaction is in the debtor's best interests and its estate--not specific creditors or other constituencies. A consensus developed almost 40 years ago that such transactions would be approved if supported by an articulated business justification.

That justification has always been fluid. The initial question is whether the judge decides that issue independently or defers to the debtor's "articulated business purpose" or "business judgment" and what that means. Different courts define the same standard differently. When applying a rule, what courts say they do and what they do are sometimes different.

Further complicating the analysis, when parties attempt to include in sale contracts, bidding terms, or restructuring agreements fees and expenses that look like Section 503 administrative claims, many courts are subjecting the terms to a substantial contribution test. Rules that permit deference only to decisions by bona fide independent directors or management invite scrutiny of that independence.

Listen as this experienced panel of bankruptcy lawyers discusses the limitations on a debtor's business judgment in Chapter 11.

Presented By

Jaime Leggett
Attorney
Best Amron

Mr. Leggett practices in the areas of bankruptcy and complex commercial litigation. His experience includes investigating and prosecuting director and officer liability claims; representing trustees, creditors, equity holders, and debtors in bankruptcy proceedings; federal and state court commercial litigation; and trials in federal, bankruptcy, and state courts nationwide.

Frank A. Oswald
Partner
Togut Segal & Segal, LLP

For more than 30 years, Mr. Oswald has focused his practice exclusively on bankruptcy, out-of-court restructurings and creditors' rights matters. He has represented clients in all facets of bankruptcy cases as well as insolvency issues in business transactions. 

Dana R. Quick
Partner
Best Amron

Ms. Quick practices in the area of insolvency and commercial litigation. Her experience includes prosecuting director and officer liability claims; representing trustees, creditors, creditor committees, and debtors in bankruptcy proceedings; state court insolvency litigation; and prosecuting and defending preference actions. Additionally, Ms. Quick has significant experience representing and counseling companies of all sizes on employment issues, including ADA, FMLA, and Title VII matters.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, February 23, 2022

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. History of the business judgment rule under Sections 363 and 365
  2. Exceptions to business judgment rule of decision
  3. How the inclusion of Section 503 fees in orders or agreements affects analysis
  4. Strategies for leveraging ambiguities in the standard
  5. Additional issues considered when transactions involve insiders and affiliates

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What exactly is the business judgment rule in bankruptcy?
  • Do courts apply state law business judgment tests?
  • Does ambiguity in the standards offer leverage points to stakeholders?