BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Trademark and Copyright
  • schedule 90 minutes

Counterfeiting Claims and Remedies: Not Limited to Cases Involving "Stitch-for-Stitch" Copies

Availability of Special Remedies for Counterfeiting in a Broader Universe of Cases

$347.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

Recovering meaningful monetary awards in Lanham Act cases is challenging, even where a likelihood of confusion is proven. But, in cases of infringement that involve the use of a counterfeit mark, the Lanham Act provides for special remedies, including statutory damages or mandatory treble damages and attorneys' fees. Requests for these special remedies in a complaint can improve your clients' chances of obtaining an early and favorable settlement, assist in obtaining larger awards in cases of default, and increase monetary awards after trial. It is important, therefore, to know whether your case involves the use of a counterfeit mark.

In the paradigmatic example of counterfeiting, illicit sellers offer cheap knock-offs that attempt to copy "stitch-for-stitch" every aspect of a genuine good. Many district courts have found that the Lanham Act's special remedies for counterfeiting are available only in such cases. Indeed, until recently, McCarthy's treatise suggested this as well. To date, however, no appellate court has endorsed this approach. And, the plain language of the Lanham Act does not support this interpretation.

In fact, the Lanham Act's special remedies for counterfeiting are available in any case of infringement "involving" the use of a "counterfeit mark." A "counterfeit mark" is a mark that is identical, or substantially indistinguishable from, a registered mark and applied to the same type of goods as in the registration. Thus, the Lanham Act's special remedies for counterfeiting should be available in any case of infringement involving an identical mark, even if the goods to which it is applied, or their packaging, differ in appearance from the mark owner's goods.

The Ninth Circuit has recently suggested that this analysis is correct and the relevant section of McCarthy has recently been updated to reflect that the relevant issue is the similarity of the marks and not the similarity of the parties' products. The issue is presently before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as well.

Listen as our authoritative panel of IP attorneys examines the special remedies available in cases involving counterfeit marks, discusses the relevant statutory language, reviews various district court cases and discusses how they fit, or do not fit, under the statutory language of the Lanham Act, as well as outlines current developments in this area. Finally, the panel will offer best practices for navigating the counterfeiting minefield.

Presented By

Rod S. Berman
Partner, Chair of Intellectual Property Group
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Mr. Berman focuses on patent, trademark, trade dress, copyright, unfair competition and internet responsibilities. His practice includes counseling, litigation, opinions, licensing, acquisition and prosecution. Mr. Berman represents many nationally and internationally known clients, and has been involved in a number of published patent, trademark and copyright cases in a wide variety of industries. He has worked on a broad range of matters including those involving aircraft, apparel, automotive, beauty care, bicycles, biotechnology, cannabis products including CBDs, hemp and extraction techniques, celebrity endorsement, computer-related business methods, dietary and nutritional supplements, electrochemistry, food and restaurants, health care, inflatables, insecticides, jewelry, medical devices, packaging, pharmaceuticals, polymers, pressure sensors, retail, special effects, sports and entertainment, and toys. 

Jessica B. Sparkman
Partner
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Ms. Sparkman represents clients in a variety of industries in all facets of trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including selection and acquisition, protection, federal trademark application and registration, opinions, portfolio management, enforcement, co-existence and settlement agreements, domain names, and litigation. She has experience managing portfolios of more than 2000 trademark registrations, has applied for or maintained trademark registrations in more than 150 countries, and has managed a global trademark monitoring and enforcement program involving hundreds of proceedings and negotiations in more than 50 countries. Ms. Sparkman counsels clients about agreements to acquire, sell, and protect intellectual property, including assignments, acquisitions, licenses, and non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements, and has performed due diligence for clients in numerous large transactions. She also litigates trademark, unfair competition, copyright, patent, trade secret, and privacy rights cases in state and federal court, and has extensive experience practicing before the TTAB.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Friday, January 26, 2024

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. The Lanham Act's special remedies for counterfeiting
  2. Statutory language and definitions
  3. Inconsistent district court approaches and the requirement for "stitch-for-stitch" copying
  4. Recent developments
  5. Best practices

The panel will review these and other notable issues:

  • Current trends in counterfeiting and available remedies
  • Court treatment of counterfeiting and handling the inconsistent treatment
  • Steps for IP counsel to pursue legal action against counterfeiters