BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • card_travel Class Action and Other Litigation
  • schedule 90 minutes

Defeating Class Certification by Attacking Plaintiffs' Classwide Damages Models

$297.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

Proof of damages has never been more important to class action litigation. For nearly ten years, it has been black letter law that the damages model that plaintiffs rely on to demonstrate predominance must measure only those damages flowing from the plaintiffs' theory of liability.

Since the seminal case of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, federal courts have increased scrutiny of proposed classwide damages models, leading to denials of certification where such evidence is missing or invalid.

Methods to calculate classwide damages include surveys, event studies, regression analysis, and others. The panel will review several such approaches and discuss some of their assumptions and limitations that may support an opposition to class certification.

Listen as our authoritative panel explains current trends in the use and court treatment of damages models since Comcast and considerations for challenging flawed models as a strategy to defeat certification.

Presented By

Theresa Wardon Benz
Partner
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP

Ms. Benz represents clients such as Ford, Michelin, and Whirlpool in nationwide high-stakes appeals, litigation, and trials. She is an accomplished appellate practitioner with experience in multiple states and the U.S. Supreme Court, having authored multiple Supreme Court amicus briefs. Prior to joining WTO, Ms. Benz served as an appellate clerk to The Hon. Neil M. Gorsuch, then of the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. In 2017, the American Bar Association named Theresa one of the top 40 young lawyers in America in its annual "On the Rise" list.

Theresa Benz
Northwestern Univ School of Law
Chuan Cheng
Partner
Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell

Ms. Cheng helps clients navigate the intricacies of complex commercial disputes. She handles cases involving breach of contract, trade secrets, antitrust and unfair competition, and shareholder derivative and securities class actions. In 2018, the American Bar Association named Ms. Cheng to its Top 40 Young Lawyers On the Rise, which recognizes just 40 young lawyers nationwide who exemplify high achievement, innovation, vision, leadership, and legal and community service.

Dawn B. Williams
Partner
Faegre Drinker

Ms. Williams defends insurance companies in complex civil litigation and class actions in federal and state courts across the country. Combining a thorough knowledge of class action procedure with an understanding of current regulatory developments, she counsels her clients on myriad issues pertaining to their life insurance and annuity products, including the adequacy of disclosures in illustrations and marketing materials, cost of insurance concerns, and claims arising as a result of stranger-originated life insurance and annuity transactions. Ms. Williams has broad experience in a variety of substantive areas, including RICO, regulatory and state statutory violations, such as unfair competition and deceptive trade practices claims, and various common law claims.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Thursday, June 2, 2022

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. Comcast and its influence on the evidence of class damages
  2. Recent decisions affecting the type of evidence needed at certification
  3. How courts have recently construed Comcast and its progeny when considering attacks on proposed class damages models
  4. Assumptions and limitations of different types of damages methods

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What has been the continued legacy of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend with respect to damages models in class litigation?
  • How have recent cases on standing affected how courts analyze plaintiffs' damages models?
  • What are various damages methods plaintiffs use to demonstrate the predominance of classwide damages and the assumptions and limitations of such methods?
  • How can defense counsel challenge plaintiffs' damages models to oppose class certification?