BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel ERISA
  • schedule 90 minutes

Defending (and Defeating) Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Claims

$347.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

The MHPAEA has become a regular presence in both class actions and participant lawsuits involving mental health or substance abuse benefits available under group health plans. The DOL also is aggressively auditing group health plans (and the third parties that administer them) to ensure compliance with the MHPAEA. Health plan administrators and insurers regularly face ERISA administrative claims for group health plan benefits that assert MHPAEA claims, the complexity and novelty of which often challenge existing procedures for reviewing these sorts of claims. State statutory analogues to the MHPAEA, along with traditional ERISA litigation principles, add additional complexity to these disputes.

Listen as experienced ERISA litigators Andrew Holly and Nicholas Pappas provide background on the MHPAEA, as well as the complex NQTL found in the DOL’s MHPAEA regulations. They will describe case decisions interpreting the MHPAEA and its regulations. And they will provide advice for plan sponsors, third party administrators, and insurers on how to successfully defend against MHPAEA claims in litigation, during DOL audits, and at the administrative stage.

Presented By

Andrew Holly
Partner
Dorsey & Whitney Llp

Mr. Holly serves as co-chair of Dorsey’s ERISA Litigation Practice Group. He has 20 years' experience representing fiduciaries, sponsors, and insurers in ERISA litigation matters. For the last three years, he has been ranked by Chambers as one of the top ERISA litigators in the nation. 

Nicholas J. Pappas
Partner
Dorsey & Whitney Llp

Mr. Pappas litigates and counsels with respect to complex employment disputes, including in relation to antidiscrimination laws, restrictive covenant agreements, executive employment agreements, discipline, discharge, and disability, among other issues, in federal and state courts, administrative agencies, and arbitral fora. He also concentrates on the defense of ERISA class actions challenging the administration of health care benefit plans, 401(k) plans, and defined benefit plans. In these matters he regularly litigates and counsels on sophisticated legal issues arising in ERISA litigation, including preemption, standing, exhaustion, fiduciary duties, disclosure obligations, withdrawal liability, plan termination, and benefit accrual.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Tuesday, March 12, 2024

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. Background on the MHPAEA and the NQTL’s, including recent updates under the Consolidated Appropriations Act (“CAA”)
  2. Background on case decisions interpreting the MHPAEA and the NQTL’s
  3. DOL’s MHPAEA interpretations, priorities, and enforcement actions
  4. Disclosure issues under the MHPAEA
  5. Tips and strategies on how to litigate and defend litigation, DOL enforcement, and ERISA administrative claims under the MHPAEA.

The panel will review these and other crucial questions:

  • The interpretation and application of the MHPAEA and the NQTLs (including recent regulatory and statutory updates)
  • Strategies for successfully and efficiently defeating MHPAEA claims in litigation
  • How to address MHPAEA claims in the administrative ERISA claim for benefit process
  • DOL’s MHPAEA interpretations, priorities, and enforcement actions
  • Addressing disclosure issues under the MHPAEA