BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Patent
  • schedule 90 minutes

Design Patents: Meeting Obviousness and Novelty Requirements

BarbriPdBannerMessage

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE course will guide patent counsel in prosecuting and litigating design patent claims. The panel will examine recent USPTO and court treatment of novelty and obviousness issues and offer best practices for prosecuting and defending against obviousness and novelty attacks in litigation.

Description

While many of the same requirements govern the patentability of utility inventions and designs, the application of those requirements in these two contexts can be entirely different. Like utility inventions, designs must be novel and not obvious, but recent ambiguous rulings from the USPTO and courts have blurred the distinction between the two.

As a result, it can be seemingly easier to prove lack of novelty based on a single reference that is not identical to the claimed design than it can be to demonstrate that a design is obvious.

Listen as our authoritative panel guides patent counsel prosecuting and litigating design patent claims in the U.S. The panel will examine recent USPTO and court treatment of novelty and obviousness issues and offer best practices for prosecuting design patent applications and defending against obviousness and novelty attacks in litigation.

Presented By

Christopher V. Carani
Shareholder
Mcandrews, Held & Malloy Ltd

Mr. Carani is a Shareholder at McAndrews and has been at the firm since 1995. He practices in all areas of intellectual property law with a particular emphasis on design law, which regards the protection and enforcement of rights in the appearance of consumer products. Mr. Carani has extensive experience litigating design patent cases, including representations before U.S. district courts, the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the International Trade Commission. In each year since 2019, he has been named to the IAM Strategy 300: The World’s Leading IP Strategists list, with IAM magazine noting that he is “one of the world’s leading design patent strategists,” one of the U.S.’s “pre-eminent design law experts,” and “widely regarded as one of the country’s premier design patent lawyers.” In 2023, in Columbia Sportswear v. Seirus, Mr. Carani successfully argued a case of first impression before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, creating new law on the issue of the proper scope of comparison prior art used in the design patent infringement analysis. He has extensive experience in creating valuable design right portfolios. He represents some of the world’s most design-centric companies, including the top filer of U.S. design patents. Mr. Carani has procured thousands of strategic design rights, both in the U.S. and in over 70 countries around the world. He counsels a wide range of clients (big and small) on design protection and enforcement issues and is often called upon to render infringement, validity, and design-around opinions.

Tracy-Gene Durkin
Director
Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox Pllc

Ms. Durkin heads the firm’s Mechanical and Design Patent Group. With nearly 30 years of experience obtaining and enforcing IP rights, she has a deep understanding of utility and design patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Ms. Durkin has been an Adjunct Professor at George Mason University Law School and has spoken internationally on topics such as the interplay between design patents and trade dress, and protection of user interface and the user experience. She is currently a Vice Chair of the Industrial Designs Committee of IP Section of the ABA.

Robert S. Katz
Principal Shareholder
Banner & Witcoff Ltd

Both nationally and internationally, Mr. Katz is considered one of the premier practitioners in the field of industrial designs, leading the way in the procurement and enforcement of design patents. On behalf of the firm’s clients, he has helped procure more than 10,000 design patents in the U.S. and more than 30,000 design patents/registrations outside the U.S. and has helped to successfully enforce over 100 design patents. Leaders from foreign design patent offices have consulted with him regarding industrial design policies, and he has served as an expert in design patent litigations. Mr. Katz holds leadership positions in several professional organizations, including ABA, AIPLA, FICPI and INTA. He is the past Chair of INTA’s Designs Committee and Vice President of FICPI’s U.S. Section. For the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law, he currently serves as Liaison to FICPI. He also serves as a member of the Industrial Designs working group of the AIPLA Special Committee on Legislation. Mr. Katz is a former Chair of the Industrial Design Section for both FICPI and AIPLA, and also a member of IDSA and IPO.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, December 20, 2023

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. The novelty standard for designs and how it has evolved based on recent rulings from the Federal Circuit
  2. The obviousness standard for designs and how it has evolved based on recent rulings from the Federal Circuit
  3. Recent USPTO and district court treatment of novelty and obviousness
  4. Challenging novelty and obviousness rejections at the USPTO
  5. Best practices for defending against obviousness and novelty attacks in post-grant proceedings and litigation

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How do the novelty and obviousness requirements for design patents differ from utility patents and each other?
  • How has the Federal Circuit and PTAB treated the issue of novelty and obviousness for design patents?
  • What are the steps that patent applicants can take to stand up to novelty and obviousness rejections before the USPTO?