• videocam On-Demand Webinar
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Environmental
  • schedule 90 minutes

Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging: Compliance With Multistate Producer Obligations

PRO Registration and Fees, Reporting, Contracts, and Enforcement Preparedness

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will examine extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging in state markets that are increasingly imposing new producer regulations. The panel will examine who is the "producer" (brand owner, manufacturer, importer, distributor, and sometimes retailer), what materials are covered, and how to build a reliable compliance workflow across jurisdictions.

Description

Packaging EPR regulations exist as a patchwork, implemented state-by-state with differing definitions, timing, exemptions, reporting requirements, and fee structures. Seven states are frequently cited as packaging EPR jurisdictions (Maine, Oregon, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Maryland, Washington). Each has varied progress in implementing its program.

The panel will focus on producer determination and allocation, product and packaging data mapping, PRO enrollment and submissions, and strategies to manage data. The experts will examine how producer obligations can be reflected in supply chain contracts and how companies should prepare for enforcement, penalties, and reputational risk should registration or reporting be missed.

Listen as our panel navigates packaging EPR compliance across emerging state programs, anticipating regulatory change, and designing an approach that is defensible, scalable, and business aligned. 

Presented By

Sidney L. Fowler
Partner
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Mr. Fowler provides comprehensive regulatory services to energy sector clients, advising them on regulatory matters and, when necessary, representing clients before regulatory bodies including the NRC, FERC, OMB, EPA and OSHA. He frequently provides due diligence for investments into energy technology developers, ensuring that regulatory aspects are thoroughly evaluated and addressed. Mr. Fowler also partners with clients in developing targeted strategies for engagement on emerging issues, with a holistic view of legislative, agency and political issues, to address and mitigate potential regulatory impacts.

Katherine Meek
Attorney
Saul Ewing LLP

Ms. Meek assists clients with environmental litigation and enforcement actions involving permitting, reporting, compliance, and liability issues. Her experience covers a wide range of matters before federal agencies including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE). Ms. Meek also assists with cases before myriad state and local agencies in California, including the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR), California Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). She has specific experience with litigation, trial preparation, and compliance matters involving the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund), the Hazardous Substances Account Act (HSAA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Ms. Meek also helps clients evaluate the extent of environmental exposures and whether they face liability as potentially responsible parties for releases of chemicals of concern in air, water, soil, and other environmental media. 

Alison B. Torbitt
Partner / Co-leader, Food, Beverage & Agribusiness / Co-leader, Environmental / Co-leader, ESG Practice
Nixon Peabody LLP

Ms. Torbitt co-leads the Food, Beverage & Agribusiness and Environmental teams and is active in maritime matters. She focuses on environmental compliance and transactional due diligence, counseling a large range of manufacturers, developers (including renewable energy projects), and financing parties to find solutions and mitigate and allocate the risk associated with all aspects of environmental law, including the latest developments from emerging contaminants (PFAS) to controversial subjects like vapor intrusion attenuation factors.

Reza Zarghamee
Partner
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Mr. Zarghamee advises U.S. and international clients on a vast array of environmental and sustainable finance matters, including the strategies for performing compliance audits, devising remediation strategies, responding to governmental investigations, defending against enforcement actions, chemical regulation, toxic torts litigation defense, transactional due diligence, devising remediation strategies and SEC disclosures. He heads Pillsbury’s efforts in the field of chemical regulation and emerging contaminants, and co-chairs the firm’s Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Task Force. Mr. Zarghamee's experience in the field of chemical regulation is particularly diverse and encompasses work under federal statutes, such as the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as well as state laws, such California’s Prop 65.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Monday, June 8, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Packaging EPR primer, what is it, covered materials, exclusions

II. The "producer" question and responsibility allocation

A. Brand owner/manufacturer/importer/private label

B. Corporate groups, affiliates, and distributorships

C. Documentation and defensible determinations re: producer status

III. The multistate landscape and current state of implementation

A. Common threads and key differences

B. Future jurisdictions and adoption; California and others

IV. Compliance operations: registration, reporting, and fees

A. Data capture, reporting, fee mechanics

V. Producer responsibility organizations and program participation

VI. Contracts and allocation strategies: drafting, indemnity, inspection, change in law

VII. Enforcement and litigation preparedness

VIII. Practitioner takeaways

The panel will explore these and other key areas:

  • Determining the "producer" in complex structures
  • Building a packaging data inventory to support submissions and fee forecasting
  • Working with a producer responsibility organization
  • Key deadlines and restrictions that may attach if a producer is not participating
  • Allocating EPR responsibility in the supply chain
  • Managing regulatory uncertainty and implementation risk