Description
Rescission is a powerful weapon for insurers alleging misstatements or concealment of fact in policy applications or renewals. An alternative to rescission is the prior knowledge exclusion that may serve to avoid coverage for a particular claim based on a misstatement or omission but otherwise keeps the policy in force.
Two recent 2016 cases, Heinz v. Starr and Fireman’s Fund Insurance v. Great American Insurance, amply demonstrate the importance of choice of law and the fact that legal standards underlying a misrepresentation claim vary among jurisdictions. In Heinz, “intentional and unintentional misrepresentations” were both actionable under New York law. In other states, rescission is appropriate only when the policyholder makes false representation “knowingly or in bad faith.”
Insurer counsel must be keenly aware of the circumstances that give rise to a credible claim that the policyholder failed to disclose pertinent facts relating to the insured risks. Policyholder counsel must anticipate potential bases for policy rescission and exclusion of coverage and be prepared to take appropriate measures to minimize the risks.
Listen as our authoritative panel of attorneys discusses varying legal standards underlying a misrepresentation claim seeking policy rescission and recent case law on rescission and related exclusions. The panel will look at arguments for insurers asserting misrepresentation and measures policyholders can take to avoid or defend such claims.
Presented By
Mr. Barker focuses his practice in the area of complex commercial insurance litigation, including coverage, claim practices, sales practices, risk classification and selection, agent relationships, and regulatory matters. In addition to handling complex litigation, he counsels clients on insurance issues. He also advises and litigates on matters of lawyers' professional responsibility.
Ms. Branthoover practices in the area of complex commercial litigation and international arbitration, with a particular focus on insurance coverage disputes arising under a wide variety of liability and property policies related to environmental, toxic tort, employment, business interruption, and product liabilities. She has represented major industrial and commercial clients in numerous state and federal courts and has acted as lead trial counsel in a number of high stakes disputes before both U.S. courts and international arbitration tribunals under the Rules of the AAA, ICDR and LCIA.
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
-
Date + Time
- event
Thursday, October 13, 2016
- schedule
1:00 PM E.T.
- Insurance policy rescission
- Misrepresentation and concealment
- Intent
- Materiality
- Reliance
- Burden of proof
- Waiver and estoppel
- Prior knowledge exclusions
- Objective v. subjective knowledge
- Severability provisions
- Pursuing or Protecting Against Policy Rescission
- Insured’s application and renewals
- Underwriting process
- Duty of insurer to investigate representations
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What are the legal standards for policy rescission—and what can policyholders do to minimize this risk?
- How are prior knowledge exclusions applied?
- Does the insurer have a duty to investigate policyholder representations during the underwriting process?
Related Courses
Cyber Insurance: Recent Decisions Interpreting Coverage Grants, Conditions to Coverage, Definitions, Exclusions
Friday, October 24, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT