• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month June 11, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Patent
  • schedule 90 minutes

Machine Learning and Patent Eligibility: Recent Court Guidance and Strategy

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will guide patent attorneys on the Federal Circuit's recent decisions, including Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com Inc., addressing machine learning and AI claims and patent eligibility. The panel will discuss the lessons from these decisions and offer best practices for patent drafting strategies in light of the recent decisions.

Description

Machine learning has met nothing but roadblocks at the Federal Circuit but has received a clear path forward at the USPTO. This webinar will help practitioners navigate the path to patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for machine-learning inventions.

The Federal Circuit has twice struck down machine-learning patents for failing to recite patent eligible subject matter. First, in Recentive Analytics Inc. v. Fox Corp. et al. (April 2025), the Federal Circuit ruled on "whether claims that do no more than apply established methods of machine learning to a new data environment are patent eligible." The Federal Circuit held "they are not." Then, in February 2026, the Federal Circuit yet again struck down machine-learning claims in Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc. (nonprecedential). The Federal Circuit treated the claims as an abstract idea and found there was no inventive concept under Alice’s step two. 

In contrast, the USPTO designated Ex parte Desjardins as precedential in November 2025. There, the Appeals Review Panel found machine-learning claims patent eligible by relying on the Federal Circuit’s Enfish decision. The panel held that the claims recited a technological improvement in “how the machine learning model itself operates.”

Patent counsel should carefully consider the lessons from recent court decisions and USPTO guidance. What can an applicant do to demonstrate the patent eligibility of AI, including machine learning? How will the USPTO handle the question of subject matter eligibility for AI under its more expansive stance? How should patent practitioners manage to meet the standards being used by both the USPTO and the Federal Circuit?

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys addresses the Federal Circuit's recent decisions and the lessons that can be learned for AI-related 101 challenges. The panel will also discuss the USPTO’s guidance on AI and machine learning and will offer best practices for patent drafting strategies and defending against § 101 challenges in the courts.

Presented By

Robert W. Bahr
Partner
Maier & Maier, PLLC

Mr. Bahr specializes in all areas of patent practice. He previously served as the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy at the USPTO. During his distinguished career at the USPTO, he was involved in nearly all patent-related rulemaking since 1995. His involvement in patent rulemaking includes the changes to implement the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 and the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. He provided administrative oversight and direction for the activities of the Office of Petitions, Office of Patent Legal Administration, Office of Patent Quality Assurance, Central Reexamination Unit, and Manual of Patent Examining Procedure staff during his tenure at the USPTO.

Michael L. Kiklis
Founder
Kiklis Law Firm, PLLC

Mr. Kiklis focuses on PTAB litigation as well as district court patent litigation. He also handles Federal Circuit appeals from his cases. With an extensive background in computer science, his technological focus is on software patent matters. Mr. Kiklis frequently handles high stakes matters, having been involved in several cases in which over $1 billion was at stake.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Thursday, June 11, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Recent Federal Circuit decisions

II. USPTO guidance for AI-related patent applications

III. Drafting implications for AI patents

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • Drafting an AI patent to increase the likelihood of success at the patent office as well as surviving 101 challenges in the district courts and at the Federal Circuit.
  • What are the best arguments to make at the district courts and the Federal Circuit to defend an AI/machine learning patent?
  • What are the best arguments to make at the USPTO to gain allowance of an AI patent application?