• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month September 23, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Employment and Workers Comp
  • schedule 90 minutes

New EEOC National Enforcement Plan FY2025-FY2029: Agency Priorities, Policy Shift, Best Practices for Compliance

Focusing on DEI, Religious Accommodation, Disparate Treatment vs. Disparate Impact; Testing Legal Boundaries in Recent SCOTUS Cases

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will guide employment practitioners through the EEOC's new National Enforcement Plan Fiscal Years 2025-2029 (NEP) and the areas of agency focus and enforcement activity signaling a major policy shift under the Trump administration. EEOC enforcement priorities under the NEP include a focus on certain DEI-related employment practices, religious accommodation, and disparate treatment claims while eliminating disparate impact theories in investigations. The panel will offer best practices for helping clients identify potential risk areas and create compliance strategies.

Description

In its recently released NEP, the EEOC signals a major policy shift under the Trump administration, rescinding the Biden-era Strategic Enforcement Plan and focusing on new enforcement priorities. Counsel should be aware of the EEOC's investigative priorities to help their clients identify potential risk exposure and develop compliance strategies.

Key areas on which the agency will focus its enforcement activity include: (1) DEI policies, programs, and practices; (2) religious accommodation; (3) disparate treatment claims while working to eliminate disparate impact claims; and (4) claims involving the application or scope of recent Supreme Court cases that have left unresolved issues in order to test or clarify legal boundaries such as the scope of Bostock v. Clayton County with respect to certain issues in the workplace involving sex-based classifications, the scope of liability under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, and the application of the "some harm" standard in Muldrow v. St. Louis

Listen as our expert panel guides employment practitioners through the EEOC's NEP. The panel will discuss key areas on which the agency will focus enforcement activity so that counsel can best advise their employer clients on policy and procedural developments that will maintain compliance and mitigate risk.

Presented By

James A. Paretti
Shareholder, Co-Chair of Workplace Policy Institute
Littler Mendelson PC

Mr. Paretti is an experienced management-side employment and labor relations attorney with in-depth political and policy knowledge of labor, pension, healthcare and employment law, regulations and legislation. He is well versed in all aspects of legislative and political processes with demonstrated knowledge in the substance of federal labor and employment policy. Mr. Paretti has over two decades of experience working with federal legislators and policymakers, including former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Chairmen of the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce, and senior level administration officials.

Christopher T. Patrick
Principal; Co-Lead Workplace Analytics & Preventive Strategies Group
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Mr. Patrick partners with employers on practical solutions to ensure equal employment opportunity (EEO), including counseling on affirmative action, pay equity and transparency, and diversity. In short, he develops actionable strategies under privilege that identify and eliminate unseen barriers to EEO in personnel practices—often informed by trends in employee data. Mr. Patrick’s work focuses on developing affirmative action programs, proactive pay analyses, diversity analyses, statistical evaluation of employment practices, and defending U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs (OFCCP) compliance reviews. He has successfully guided many federal contractors through hundreds of OFCCP audits, including Corporate Management Compliance Evaluations, on-site investigations, focused reviews, compensation scrutiny, and hiring discrimination investigations. Mr. Patrick also provides advice and counsel related to potential risks of reduction in force, latent liabilities in target acquisition employment practices, and other analytics in the context of client mergers, acquisitions, and other restructuring.

Sherry L. Talton
Shareholder
Ogletree Deakins

Ms. Talton represents local and national employers in litigation in state and federal courts of all levels and governmental agencies including the EEOC and its state counterparts. From the outset of a dispute, she works with clients to develop a strategy that leads to successful resolutions. Ms. Talton also helps employers avoid litigation by addressing day-to-day workplace issues proactively. She uses her litigation experience to work closely with clients across all industries to provide effective preventative counseling. This includes regularly advising clients on disability and leave management, performance challenges, hiring, diversity, DEI compliance, drug testing, background checks, non-competition agreements, trade secret protections, employment contracts, discipline, terminations, and layoffs. Ms. Talton is an experienced management and workforce trainer whose courses are accessible, dynamic, and interactive. She has experience representing clients in a wide range of industries, including the restaurant/hospitality, real estate, healthcare, insurance, and tech industries, as well as municipal employers.



Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, September 23, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Introduction: agency policy shift

II. EEOC National Enforcement Plan Fiscal Years 2025-2029

A. Global principles

B. Substantive categories of priorities

C. Chair priorities

D. Implementation

III. Best practices for employer risk assessment and compliance strategies

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • On what principles does the agency claim to base the NEP?
  • What are the categories of substantive priorities that the EEOC will focus on in its enforcement activities?
  • How does the agency plan on testing or clarifying the application of recent Supreme Court decisions impacting discrimination in the workplace?
  • What should counsel and their employer clients be doing now to mitigate the risk of EEOC enforcement action?