BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam Live Online with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month December 4, 2025 @ 1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Patent
  • schedule 90 minutes

Patent Disclosure for AI Inventions in the U.S. and Europe: Key Considerations, Strategies for Disclosure

$347.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

When it comes to AI inventions, there is uncertainty as to what comprises sufficient disclosure under Article 83 EPC in Europe and what is needed to meet Section 112 written description requirements in the U.S. As a result, it is important for patent counsel to carefully consider what to disclose and what not to disclose in a patent application when seeking patent protection for AI inventions.

Based on the decisions to date, the USPTO seems to be looking for more specific implementation details than in other computer-related fields. In Europe, AI inventions face stricter written disclosure scrutiny than in the U.S. To meet the tougher scrutiny, patent applications must explain the problem the AI invention solves and how it does so.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines disclosure requirements in both the U.S. and Europe when seeking patent protection for AI inventions. The panel will discuss the guidance from the relevant patent offices and will compare the European approach and the U.S. approach. The panel will also offer best practices for meeting disclosure requirements for AI patents in the U.S. and Europe.

Presented By

Luigi Distefano
Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP

Mr. Distefano is a UK and European patent attorney whose practice focuses on patent prosecution, portfolio development and management, drafting, client counseling, and oppositions and appeals before the European Patent Office (EPO). He predominantly handles subject matter in the fields of electronic and mechanical engineering, and has extensive experience in dealing with the nuances of prosecuting computer implemented inventions in Europe.

Kelly S. Horn
Attorney
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP

Ms. Horn combines her extensive knowledge of Patent Office practice with her experience as a patent litigator to help clients build, assert, and defend strategic portfolios of utility and design patents. She helps clients with patent prosecution, non-infringement and invalidity analyses, written opinions, and pre-litigation diligence as a patent agent upon registration before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Ms. Horn maintains an active patent prosecution and counseling practice, assisting clients with building strategic portfolios of utility and design patents worldwide. She helps clients assert and defend patent infringement claims before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and in U.S. district courts. Her technical experience spans a broad range of technologies.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Thursday, December 4, 2025

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

I. Disclosure requirements

A. U.S.

B. Europe

II. Disclosure risks for AI-related inventions

III. Guidance from patent offices

A. USPTO

B. EPO

C. Others

IV. Best practices for meeting disclosure requirements

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What disclosure risks must counsel address when seeking protection for AI-related inventions?
  • What guidance do the patent offices provide related to disclosure with AI inventions?
  • What strategies should counsel employ when determining whether and when to disclose?