BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Personal Injury and Med Mal
  • schedule 90 minutes

Personal Injury and Jury Selection: Gaining the Advantage by Replacing the Checklist Approach to Voir Dire

$197.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

Success at trial often hinges on seating the right jury, but voir dire and jury selection too frequently get short shrift both in training, generally, and during a particular case. By increasing proficiency in these skills, counsel can significantly raise the odds of an advantageous resolution.

Jury selection is both art and science. The panel will discuss why the attorney's mindset and attitudes towards the panel are pivotal to the jury selection process. Our program will also discuss how every phase and aspect of the case plays a role in peeling back the onion of understanding the client, the witnesses, the opposition, and the values and attitudes in the matter. This is the knowledge needed for effective voir dire, and it cannot be amassed on the eve of trial.

Listen as our panel discusses strategies and tactics for getting more desirable trial results through more precise voir dire and jury selection.

Presented By

Shari Belitz
Consultant
Shari Belitz Communications, LLC

Ms. Belitz is a litigation consultant and strategist, owner and CEO of Shari Belitz Communications, LLC a company which provides mock trials, focus groups, jury selection, and other litigation consulting services to lawyers and insurance industry professionals.  She is also founder of its companion course EnPSYCHLAWpedia™, an educational platform which uses video and written materials to teach lawyers how to use social psychology to achieve favorable litigation outcomes, at settlement or trial.

Kelly Hanker
Attorney
Trial Lawyers for Justice

Ms. Hanker is a trial attorney known for increasing the value of cases across the country, including catastrophic and traumatic injury, employment, business litigation, class action, and medical malpractice cases. Ms. Hanker’s connection to her clients after sustaining a life-long disability in a car crash herself and being called in to the Plaintiff’s side by her then trial attorney—now mentor, Nick Rowley—is unmatched. Ms. Hanker, now often referred to as the Empathy Lawyer, has repeatedly been named a Super Lawyers Rising Star for Southern California, is a graduate of the Gerry Spence Method trial college and has been honored by the Los Angeles Business Journal as a finalist for Philanthropist of the Year. She also serves on the Foundation Board of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles, the Consumer Attorneys of California Women’s Caucus, the Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles’s Women in Law Committee and is a member of AAJ.

Robert E. Ray
Chief Trial Consultant
Veritas Research, LP

As a trial consultant, Dr. Ray brings a wealth of experience to the table, both as a trial consultant and as a trial attorney. Since 1998, he has provided research and courtroom consulting to attorneys in cases throughout the United States, including theme development and strategy advice. He has provided research and consulting advice in mass tort actions such as tobacco and pharmaceutical litigation to insurance disputes and entertainment and publishing cases.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, August 23, 2023

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. Introduction
  2. Why voir dire begins before anyone enters the courtroom
    1. When to start thinking about voir dire
    2. How attorney mindset plays a role
    3. How each aspect of discovery plays a role
  3. Drawing out general attitudes, opinions, biases
  4. Building rapport
  5. Getting truthful answers to difficult/sensitive questions
  6. Specific strategies for defense attorneys

The panel will review these and other crucial issues:

  • What juror attitudes and values are usually helpful to insurance companies defending personal injury cases?
  • When, how, and why would an attorney want to draw out a prospective juror's attitudes, opinions, and biases?
  • What is the proper attorney attitude for voir dire?
  • How can attorneys keep jurors participating?