• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month September 24, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Litigation
  • schedule 90 minutes

Product Liability Marketing Defects: Bringing or Defending Claims About Product Labels, Instructions, or Promotion

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will offer a comprehensive overview of claims for and defenses to product liability claims based on marketing defects. The panel will address improper labeling, insufficient instructions, inadequate warnings, and the role and potential liability of social media influencers.

Description

Manufacturers can be liable for injuries caused by something they say or write about their products, both before and after a sale. This includes what is said orally, in writing, or on the internet, such as labels; product manuals, videos, and instructions; warnings; and advertising or promotions. Presumably this includes anything generated by any software or AI. Even what third parties say may be problematic. Attempts to exclude evidence of representations available at the time of injury but not actually seen have typically not succeeded. Plaintiffs alleging that product information made the product unreasonably dangerous will support more theories of liability than just strict liability or negligence, which could account for a noted uptick in claims.

The test for determining whether a label, warning, or product instruction is defective is subjective. The key issue is whether communications or representations about a product were false or caused someone to use it in an unsafe way or to overlook potential danger. Much depends on who the intended user was. Two common sources of claims are inconsistent messaging that contradicts warnings or creates confusion and overly optimistic marketing about emerging products that suggests capabilities the product does not have.

Defendants have strong defenses and themes. They may urge that user expectations should be based on the product's actual design and instructions, not puffery nor magical thinking. One of the strongest defenses is product misuse, even if manufacturers still have to anticipate and warn against foreseeable misuse. Many cases require deep dives into predictable human behavior and what improper uses a consumer might attempt as well as how a consumer might mishandle the product.

Listen as this panel of seasoned practitioners offers guidance on product liability based on marketing defects from improper labeling, insufficient instructions, inadequate warnings, and the role and potential liability of social media influencers.

Presented By

Andrew L. Reissaus
Partner
Hollingsworth LLP

Mr. Reissaus specializes in the defense of all stages of complex litigation, including trial. He develops an in-depth grasp of cutting-edge scientific, engineering, and medical insights that he brings to bear in his practice, which focuses on pharmaceutical products liability cases, construction and engineering disputes, and toxic tort matters. Representing clients in multiple federal multidistrict litigations and state court consolidated proceedings consisting of thousands of products liability claims associated with pharmaceutical products, Mr. Reissaus has advised and represented clients at all phases of litigation from pre-litigation evaluations extending through discovery and trial. He counsels clients on pharmaceutical regulatory compliance/enforcement issues arising under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, either as stand-alone projects or as an adjunct to the defense of pharmaceutical products liability litigation and corporate acquisitions/product line due diligence. Mr. Reissaus represents construction and engineering clients in complex projects and multi-party disputes and at trial. As a trial team member, he works with experts in the engineering and construction fields, defending his clients’ experts at deposition and examining such experts and opposing experts at deposition and trial.

Kenneth Ross
Of Counsel
Bowman and Brooke

Mr. Ross practices in the areas of product safety, product liability prevention, and corporate and regulatory compliance. For many years, he has counseled on recall preparedness, reporting to the government, and undertaking recalls and has served as an expert witness in litigation involving recalls. Mr. Ross is a Partnered Consultant to The Acheson Group, a crisis management consultancy that specializes in recalls and has authored many articles on post-sale duties and recalls (see www.productliabilityprevention.com to see these articles).

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Thursday, September 24, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Type of representations

A. Labeling

B. Instructions 

C. Warnings

D. Advertising and other promotions

II. Determining whether a communication is "defective"

III. Potential defendants

IV. Theories of liability

V. Proving or refuting causation

VI. Defenses 

VII. Practical tips 

The panel will consider these and other significant questions:

  • What is foreseeable misuse?
  • Can a warning or instruction ever cure a design or manufacturing defect?
  • Why are marketing defect claims being alleged more often?
  • Should user expectations be based on the product's actual design and instructions?
  • Who is liable if AI tells a user a certain use is acceptable?