BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand Webinar
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Class Action and Other Litigation
  • schedule 90 minutes

Rule 23(c)(4) Issue Certification: Reconciling the Conflict With Rule 23(b)(3)'s Predominance Requirement

BarbriPdBannerMessage

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE course will examine limited issue certification under Rule 23(c)(4) and how narrowly or broadly different circuits interpret that rule. The panel will provide instruction on considerations and strategies for litigating certification under Rule 23(c)(4) based on recent case law and their own practical experiences.

Description

Proposed class actions seeking monetary damages are often difficult to certify because common issues do not predominate over individualized issues as required by Rule 23(b)(3). Rule 23(c)(4) provides that "[w]hen appropriate, an action may be brought or maintained as a class action with respect to particular issues."

Although Rule 23(c)(4) has been part of the rule since the landmark 1966 amendments, it was often overlooked until the Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes. Plaintiffs now routinely seek limited issue certification for purported common issues, such as liability, arguing that questions of injury, reliance, or causation should be left for individual cases. When approved, this approach increases defendants' exposure by permitting certification in some cases that would otherwise fail the Rule 23(b)(3) standards.

The federal circuits continue to be split on how issue certification should be treated under Rule 23(b)(3)'s predominance requirement. Litigants continue to seek guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court without success.

Listen as our panel of experienced class action litigators analyzes the varying circuit court positions on Rule 23(c)(4) issue classes and the implications of practitioners' decisions when pursuing or opposing class certification.

Presented By

Michael Hamburger
Partner
FBT Gibbons

Mr. Hamburger is a seasoned litigator, trial lawyer, and business adviser focused on complex civil and criminal litigation. He has represented clients in some of the largest antitrust trials over the past 15 years, advised them on antitrust compliance issues, defended them against criminal investigations, worked to secure clearance from global competition authorities for their mergers or acquisitions, and led them through all phases of civil litigation, including on appeal. Mr. Hamburger's practice focuses on defending domestic and international clients against actual or potential claims brought by class-action plaintiffs, state attorneys general, large opt-out plaintiffs, and competition agencies such as the U.S. Department of Justice. Where appropriate, he has also represented multinational corporations bringing claims against their competitors for anticompetitive practices.

Douglas J. McNamara
Partner
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC

McNamara litigates complex, multi-state class action lawsuits against manufacturers and consumer service providers such as banks, insurers, credit card companies and others. As a tireless advocate for consumers, he has worked on numerous cases involving data breaches, dangerous pharmaceuticals and medical devices, light cigarettes, defective consumer products, and environmental torts. Mr. McNamara has been involved in precedent-setting cases that tackled issues of preemption, choice of law, and class certification. He is a hands-on litigator who takes pleasure in the details, facts, and documents of each case. Prior to joining Cohen Milstein in 2001, Mr. McNamara was a litigation associate at an international defense firm, specializing in pharmaceutical and product liability cases. He started his career at New York City’s Legal Aid Society, defending indigent criminal defendants at trial and on appeal. 

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Thursday, May 9, 2024

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. The emergence of issue classes under Rule 23(c)(4)
    1. What is an issue class?
    2. How are they being strategically used?
    3. Where are the grey areas?
  2. Key court decisions on issue class certification
  3. Textual and historical analysis of Rule 23(c)(4)
  4. Litigating "issue" classes

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What is the tension between the requirements of Rule 23(c)(4) and Rule 23 (b)(3), and how are courts reconciling the conflict?
  • What impact does the rise in issue class certifications have on the trial and settlement of class claims?
  • How class action practitioners leverage the various circuit court opinions on Rule 23(c)(4) issue classes at the certification stage