- videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
- calendar_month December 4, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
- signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
- card_travel Mergers and Acquisitions
- schedule 90 minutes
Sandbagging Issues in M&A: Pro- and Anti-Sandbagging Provisions, Applying State Law
Interplay of Sandbagging With Reps and Warranties Insurance and Indemnity Provisions
Welcome to BARBRI, the trusted global leader in legal education. Continue to access the same expert-led Strafford CLE and CPE webinars you know and value. Plus, explore professional skills courses and more.
About the Course
Introduction
This CLE webinar will examine sandbagging issues in M&A, including different approaches counsel can take in acquisition agreements and how Delaware and New York courts have addressed sandbagging when deal documents are silent on the issue. The panel will also discuss sandbagging in the context of R&W insurance policies and any related indemnities in acquisition agreements.
Description
The practice of sandbagging has become common in M&A. Deal counsel have three options they can pursue in acquisition agreements: a buyer-friendly pro-sandbagging clause; a seller-friendly anti-sandbagging clause; or no provision, in which event the parties defer to the default rule of the state whose law governs the agreement.
A pro-sandbagging clause permits a buyer to seek recovery for breach of a representation or warranty even if the buyer knew or should have known that the representation or warranty was false. An anti-sandbagging clause prohibits a buyer from seeking recovery in such circumstances. Deal parties may also draft pro-sandbagging language that applies to specifically negotiated indemnities, particularly when such risks are excluded under a representation and warranty insurance policy.
The parties can also remain silent about sandbagging, an approach that is increasingly common. Where an acquisition agreement is silent, a court will apply the default rule in the jurisdiction governing the agreement. New York and Delaware generally permit sandbagging, but the case law is varied in the analysis of the issue.
Listen as our authoritative panel analyzes the different approaches that can be taken to sandbagging in M&A documents and the interpretations of sandbagging under New York and Delaware law.
Presented By
As the head of Mayer Brown's Private Capital Solutions practice, Mr. Dhanawade advises the world's most sophisticated investors and dealmakers on complex capital deployment and capital-raising strategies across all market cycles. Leading private equity sponsors and their portfolio companies, private credit funds, sovereign and sovereign-backed investors, family offices, and other institutional investors regularly rely on his advice to develop creative solutions that align legal strategy with business objectives. Mr. Dhanawade has extensive experience across a broad range of sectors, including technology and software, business and financial services, mortgage, chemicals, real estate, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, media and entertainment, aviation, aerospace and defense, and education.
Mr. Westhoff is a creative, business-minded litigator with substantial experience handling a wide variety of complex domestic and international commercial law cases, arbitrations, and government investigations. He has successfully handled matters of all sizes, including multiple “bet the company” cases with more than $1 billion in potential exposure. Mr. Westhoff’s primary area of practice include pre- and post-closing M&A disputes, securities cases and investigations, and other financial litigation. He has defended public corporations and Boards against individual and class action shareholder proxy, disclosure, and process claims. He regularly represents private equity companies in deal litigation, including post-closing indemnification and fraud claims, working capital disputes, and earn-out cases. Mr. Westhoff has represented and advised individuals and companies in SEC investigations related to the sale of securities, disclosures, and accounting/audit issues. He is the co-chair of the firm’s M&A Litigation and Class Action working groups.
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
-
Live Online
On Demand
Date + Time
- event
Friday, December 4, 2026
- schedule
1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
I. Sandbagging defined
II. Strategies to address sandbagging in deal documents
A. Pro-sandbagging provisions
B. Anti-sandbagging provisions
C. Silence
III. Interpreting applicable state law: N.Y. and Delaware
IV. Interplay with reps and warranties insurance
The panel will review these and other critical issues:
- What are the rationales for including pro-sandbagging or anti-sandbagging provisions in an acquisition agreement?
- How can sandbagging provisions be tailored for indemnity provisions and reps and warranty insurance?
- How do New York and Delaware state laws address sandbagging when an acquisition agreement is silent on the issue?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Unlimited access to Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses:
- Annual access
- Available on-demand
- Best for new attorneys
Related Courses
Attorney-Client Privilege in M&A Deals: Ethics, Best Practices, and Traps for the Unwary
Wednesday, December 16, 2026
1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
Recommended Resources
AI, Judgment, and the Future of Legal Training: Key Takeaways from Dallas
- Learning & Development
The Generational AI Education Mismatch: Expert Interview with Dennis Kennedy
- Learning & Development
- Talent Development
Expert Interview: Tara Waters and How AI Can Bring People Together
- Legal Technology