• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month July 29, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/ 10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Immigration
  • schedule 90 minutes

Temporary Protected Status After Mullin v. Doe: Executive Authority, Judicial Review, Client and Practice Implications

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will examine the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Mullin v. Doe on termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian and Syrian nationals, and the broader implications for immigration practice. The panel will discuss the Court's interpretation of the TPS statute, the scope of executive authority, the limits on judicial review, and the constitutional issues that remain following the decision.

Description

The case carries implications beyond Haiti and Syria. Immigration counsel representing TPS beneficiaries from any designated country must understand how the ruling affects litigation strategy, client counseling, case planning, employment authorization, removal exposure, and considerations for alternative immigration relief.

Listen as our authoritative panel discusses the Mullin decision, the evolving landscape governing TPS, the practical considerations for representing TPS beneficiaries (including evaluating and advising on existing TPS matters), and expectations for navigating future litigation and counseling.

Presented By

Kevin R. Johnson
Mabie-Apallas Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus, Director of the Aoki Center, and Professor Emeritus of Chicana/o Studies
UC Davis School of Law

Professor Johnson is a Mabie-Apallas Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Aoki Center. He also has an appointment as Professor of Chicana/o Studies at UC Davis. Professor Johnson joined the UC Davis law faculty in 1989 and was named Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in 1998. He then served as Dean from 2008 to 2024, the longest term in UC Davis School of Law history. Professor Johnson has taught a wide array of classes, including immigration law, civil procedure, complex litigation, Latinos and Latinas and the law, and Critical Race Theory. In 1993, he was the recipient of the law school's Distinguished Teaching Award. Professor Johnson has published extensively on immigration law and civil rights. He was one of the "10 Most-Cited Immigration Law Faculty in the U.S., 2016-2020" according to Brian Leiter's Law School Reports. Published in 1999, his book How Did You Get to Be Mexican? A White/Brown Man's Search for Identity was nominated for the 2000 Robert F. Kennedy Book Award. Professor Johnson’s book, Immigration Law and the US-Mexico Border (2011), received the Latino Literacy Now’s International Latino Book Awards – Best Reference Book. He blogs regularly on immigration law and policy developments at ImmigrationProf. In the 2025/26 academic year, Professor Johnson will publish the third edition of Immigration and Social Justice and the fourth edition of Understanding Immigration Law. A regular participant in national and international conferences, Professor Johnson has also held leadership positions in the Association of American Law Schools and the American Bar Association. He is quoted regularly by the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and other local, state, national and international news outlets. 

Geoffrey M. Pipoly
Partner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP

Mr. Pipoly is a Partner in the firm’s Appellate and Supreme Court and Business and Commercial Disputes Practice Groups. He is an experienced trial and appellate litigator who brings his skills and passion to bear on behalf of his clients at every stage of the litigation process. At the trial court level, Mr. Pipoly serves regularly as preservation counsel in complex trials. In that role, he advises trial counsel on the preservation of defenses and constitutional arguments; drafts dispositive motions; prepares jury instructions; drafts and responds to evidentiary motions and post-judgment pleadings; and consults on strategy throughout the pre-trial, trial, and post-trial stages. At the appellate level, Mr. Pipoly is passionate about drafting thorough, persuasive, and (above all) winning briefs for his clients. He has experience on a diverse array of complex topics ranging from drafting merits briefs for Fortune 50 companies in state and federal courts, to representing thousands of immigrants in a nationwide challenge to U.S. government policy, to drafting unique amicus briefs on hot-button issues involving the First Amendment, civil liberties, and LGBTQ+ rights.  

Kripa Upadhyay
Partner and Co-Chair of the Immigration & Global Mobility Practice
Buchalter

Ms. Upadhyay is the Co-Chair of Buchalter’s Immigration & Global Mobility Practice, where she advises foreign investors, founders, and multinational companies on entering, operating, and expanding within the United States. Her practice integrates U.S. immigration strategy with the broader considerations of foreign direct investment, helping clients structure cross‑border transactions while effectively managing talent mobility and regulatory risk. Ms. Upadhyay works closely with venture capital funds, private equity sponsors, family offices, and high‑growth companies to align business objectives with compliant, practical pathways into the U.S. market. She is also a trusted advisor on national security considerations related to inbound investment—particularly CFIUS analysis—and regularly supports foreign organizations investing in the technology, real estate, health‑tech, and defense sectors. Ms. Upadhyay's guidance includes advising on export‑control frameworks under ITAR and EAR to ensure workforce planning and global hiring remain compliant.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, July 29, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/ 10:00 AM PT

I. The Supreme Court's TPS decision in Mullin v. Doe

A. Statutory framework, judicial review, executive authority

B. Practical impact, affected populations, key takeaways

II. Legal issues after the decision

A. Constitutional challenges, administrative law, future litigation

B. DHS authority, unresolved questions, developing trends

III. Practice strategies going forward

A. Client counseling, work authorization, removal exposure

B. Alternative immigration options, case assessment, planning

IV. Preparing for what may come next

A. Litigation developments, policy changes, agency action

B. Practice management, client communications, best practices

The panel will address these and other key issues:

  • How did the Supreme Court interpret the TPS statute and judicial review?
  • Which claims remain reviewable after the decision, including constitutional challenges?
  • What authority does DHS retain when designating, extending, or terminating TPS?
  • How should immigration attorneys evaluate pending TPS matters?
  • What practical concerns arise with employment authorization, removal risk, and client communications?
  • What alternative immigration relief can counsel evaluate?
  • What additional litigation and policy developments should counsel expect?