BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • card_travel Banking and Finance
  • schedule 90 minutes

UCC Articles 8 and 9 and the Hague Securities Convention

Revising Securities Account and Account Control Agreements, Determining Where to File, Transitional Issues

$347.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

The Hague Securities Convention, which has been effective as a matter of United States commercial law since Apr. 1, 2017, addresses significant conflict of laws issues that arise when securities are held with a bank, broker, or clearing corporation through the so-called "indirect holding system" and have some cross-border element, e.g., the securities are issued by an issuer in another country, are held by a broker in another country, or are subject to an adverse claim from a person in another country.

The uncertainty under current law on these issues creates significant risks for securities customers, banks, brokers, clearing corporations, and third-party lenders in transactions with one or more cross-border elements. The Convention, if widely adopted, would resolve these issues and, in any event, already affects transactions under Articles 8 and 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.

Listen as our authoritative panel of commercial finance attorneys guides you through the Hague Securities Convention and its effect on current practices under Articles 8 and 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code and recent court decisions under Articles 8 and 9.

Presented By

Carl Bjerre
Kaapcke Professor of Business Law
University of Oregon

Professor Bjerre specializes in commercial law. Active in national and international projects to modernize commercial law, he is a member of the Permanent Editorial Board for the Uniform Commercial Code, the Uniform Law Commission, and the American Law Institute. He was a member of the United States delegation for the negotiation of the Geneva Securities Convention. Prior to joining the Oregon Law faculty, he practiced transactional finance law for six years with the multinational law firm of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton LLP in New York.

Sandra M. Rocks
Counsel
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

Ms. Rocks' practice focuses on commercial financing, including secured transaction and bankruptcy law. She is Co-Chair of the Investment Securities Sub-Committee of the ABA Business Law Section UCC Committee. She also serves on the TriBar Committee on Legal Opinions and participated in TriBar's preparation of its original and updated reports on security interest opinions under Article 9 of the UCC.

Edwin E. Smith
Partner
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Mr. Smith concentrates his practice in commercial law, debt financings, structured financings, workouts, bankruptcies, and international transactions. He is particularly knowledgeable on commercial law and insolvency matters, both domestic and cross-border. His representations have included those in major bankruptcies including Lehman and the City of Detroit. Mr. Smith often advises financial institutions on documentation and risk management issues.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Tuesday, December 20, 2022

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. General summary of the indirect holding system and the provisions of the Convention
  2. Impact of the Hague Securities Convention on current practices under UCC Articles 8 and 9
  3. Suggested provisions for securities account agreements and securities account control agreements
  4. Change of location for the perfection of a security interest by filing
  5. Recent UCC Articles 8 and 9 cases involving investment property

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How does the Hague Securities Convention address risks facing securities customers, banks, brokers, clearing corporations, and third-party lenders?
  • What do recent court decisions tell us about practice under Articles 8 and 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code?
  • Under what circumstances would it be prudent to insert new clauses into securities account agreements and securities account control agreements?