BarbriSFCourseDetails
  • videocam On-Demand
  • card_travel Personal Injury and Med Mal
  • schedule 90 minutes

Using an Opponent's Video Deposition at Personal Injury Trials: Conveying the Message Without Boring the Jury

Creating and Playing Short, Meaningful Deposition Clips From the Opposing Party's Video Deposition

$197.00

This course is $0 with these passes:

CLE
ALL
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack
BarbriPdBannerMessage

Description

Trial advocacy, especially in personal injury cases, has been described as part law and part theater, requiring a lawyer to know both the law and the audience. Trial attorneys have a short time to capture a jury's attention, and the effective use of technology and video depositions can be essential.

Federal Rule 32 allows the use of deposition testimony, including video depositions, for "any purpose," such as opening statements, closing statements, impeachment, and cross-examination at trial and as part of motion practice. Nonetheless, what Rule 32 gives, other rules of procedure and evidence may take away.

The "art" of video depositions requires counsel to think like the jury and master some understanding of staging, lighting, and other aspects of video to get the kind of clip best suited to support counsel's themes and messaging. Attorneys should be familiar with video terminology and how certain videographic techniques do or do not comply with the relevant rules of procedure and evidence. Many new lessons and techniques have been learned during the pandemic.

Listen as this experienced panel discusses why, how, and when personal injury attorneys can and should use the video depositions of their opponents.

Presented By

Ted Brooks
Managing Partner
Litigation-Tech, LLC

Mr. Brooks has written hundreds of articles, is a popular CLE presenter, and has won numerous professional awards for his work. In addition to supporting remote, in person and hybrid trials, arbitrations, hearings and depositions, he is a Founding Advisory Board Member of The Online Courtroom Project, a collaborative group of professionals who have conducted and published a study on remote jury trials from voir dire to verdict, and have presented the NITA/OCP Summit.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
David Katzenstein
Member-in-Charge
Eckert Seamans, LLC

Mr. Katzenstein is a litigator with over 35 years of experience in the defense of personal injury and commercial cases in New Jersey and New York, during which he has tried many cases to verdict. He has also served and tried cases as joint medical counsel in New Jersey and is currently national coordinating counsel for several clients in mass tort litigation.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Rita Morriale
Vice President
Veritext

Ms. Morriale has become a well-respected leader in the court reporting industry. Her education began with studies at Middlesex County College, before finding her passion in the practice of court reporting. Ms. Morriale started her career as stenographer, a technically challenging occupation that requires exceptional talent and training. Due to her proficiency, her career began to truly thrive in the asbestos ligation sector. Not long into her stenography career, Ms. Morriale recognized the care, support, and quality mass tort litigation requires in their reporting and transcription needs.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, June 8, 2022

  • schedule

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  1. The Rules applicable to using video depositions
    1. Rules of evidence
    2. Rules of civil procedure
    3. Local rules
    4. Recovery of deposition expenses as a taxable cost
  2. Reasons to use the opponent's video deposition testimony
  3. When and how to play excerpts
  4. The details that matter when preparing for a video deposition
  5. Special considerations with remote depositions
  6. Deposition designations playback in hybrid and remote trials
  7. Deposition playback for impeachment or absentee witnesses
  8. Deposition playback vs. remote Zoom testimony

The panel will review these and other critical issues:

  • If the video has the potential to bore the jury, why should it be used?
  • Should opposing counsel be visually present in the deposition?
  • Where should defending and opposing counsel be placed relative to the deponent?
  • How much stopping and starting of the video is permitted?
  • What strategies should counsel follow if the client may not come across well on video?
  • What options may be used for deposition playback in trial?