Continuing Impact of Notable Tax Cases: Applying Landmark Tax Decisions to Current Tax Matters
Cohan Rule, Duberstein v. Commissioner, Welch v. Helvering, Glenshaw Glass Co.

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Tax Preparer
- event Date
Friday, June 21, 2024
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
110 minutes
-
BARBRI is a NASBA CPE sponsor and this 110-minute webinar is accredited for 2.0 CPE credits.
-
BARBRI is an IRS-approved continuing education provider offering certified courses for Enrolled Agents (EA) and Tax Return Preparers (RTRP).
This webinar will review several of the most influential tax cases of all time. Our panel of astute tax controversy attorneys will highlight the original decisions' pertinent aspects, review current rulings citing these cases, and explain how these decisions should and do apply to current tax matters.
Faculty

Mr. Davis joined the firm in 2016 after more than 20 years in the public sector as a trial lawyer with extensive civil and criminal trial and appellate experience in both federal and state courts. He and his cases have been profiled by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, People Magazine, as well as national legal publications such as Tax Notes and Law360. Mr. Davis represents individuals and closely held entities in criminal tax investigations and prosecutions, civil tax controversy and litigation, sensitive-issue or complex civil tax examinations and administrative tax appeals, and federal and state white-collar criminal investigations. He represents numerous cryptocurrency clients worldwide on civil and criminal tax matters, speaks frequently on cryptocurrency, criminal tax, and Bank Secrecy Act issues, deals with civil and criminal cannabis-related tax issues, and handles civil and criminal unreported foreign account and foreign-entities investigations and disclosures. In the appellate arena, Mr. Davis has argued cases before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as both a prosecutor and defense counsel and was trial and appellate counsel on the attorney-client privilege case In re Grand Jury, which the U.S. Supreme Court heard in 2023. Mr. Davis frequently lectures on many topics throughout the country both in the private sector and as a federal prosecutor.

Mr. Kalinski specializes in both civil and criminal tax controversies as well as sensitive tax matters including disclosures of previously undeclared interests in foreign financial accounts and assets and provides tax advice to taxpayers and their advisors throughout the world. He handles both federal and state tax matters involving individuals, corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, and trusts and estates. Mr. Kalinski has considerable experience handling complex civil tax examinations, administrative appeals, and tax collection matters. Prior to joining the firm, he served as a trial attorney with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel litigating Tax Court cases and advising revenue agents and revenue officers on a variety of complex tax matters.

Mr. Horwitz has over 35 years of experience as a tax attorney specializing in the representation of clients in civil and criminal tax cases, including civil audits and appeals, tax collection matters, criminal investigations, administrative hearings and in civil and criminal trials and appeals in federal and state courts. He has served as a member of the Executive Committee of the Taxation Section of the State Bar of California and was Chair of the Taxation Section for 2015-2016 year. Mr. Horwitzwas previously Chair of the Tax Procedure and Litigation Committee of the State Bar Taxation Section. Prior to joining Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C., Mr. Horwitz was with a boutique tax controversy firm in Orange County, where he represented clients in civil and criminal tax cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeal, U.S. district courts, California superior courts, and before the Internal Revenue Service, the California Franchise Tax Board, the Board of Equalization, the Employment Development Department and the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. He has been a speaker on tax matters at the UCLA Tax Controversy Institute, the Annual Meeting of the Taxation Section of the California Bar and the California State Bar Annual Meeting. Mr. Horwitz has authored articles on tax law that have appeared in diverse publications, including Tax Notes, the Federal Lawyer (the publication of the Federal Bar Association), and the California Tax Lawyer. His monograph in “Responsible Persons and Fiduciary Liability” was published in the Proceedings of the New York University 75th Institute on Federal Taxation. Mr. Horwitz was an invited delegate to the 2015 U.S. Tax Court Judicial Conference. He is a member of the Planning Committee of the UCLA Tax Controversy Institute. Mr. Horwitz is a member of the bar in California and in Illinois. He is admitted to practice in the United States District Courts for the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Seventh, Ninth and Federal Circuits, the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Southern, Northern and Eastern Districts of California, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. Tax Court. He was named a Southern California Super Lawyer 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Description
Landmark tax cases charted the course for tax calculations and continue to impact decisions made by the courts and taxpayers. These remarkable rulings are frequently revisited and cited as preparers navigate the complexities of the Internal Revenue Code.
As famous for its namesake, George M. Cohan, as its tax implications, the Cohan Rule resulted from the resolution reached in Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1930). The Cohan Rule allows taxpayers to deduct reasonably estimated expenses when complete records do not exist. Recently, in Alvarado v. Commissioner (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2024), the court allowed Alvarado, a used car dealer, to avoid fraud penalties and estimate his cost of goods, citing the Cohan Rule.
United States v. Boyle, 469 US 241 (S. Ct. 1985) is another significant case with continuing impact. Boyle established that reliance on a tax preparer does not constitute reasonable cause for unfiled or late-filed tax returns. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently cited this case in its decision relative to e-filed returns, Lee v. U.S. 84 F.4th 1271 (11th Cir. Oct. 24, 2023). The court determined that the Boyle decision applied to electronically filed tax returns as well as paper.
Tax practitioners and advisers should be familiar with the key elements of the most influential tax cases and understand how they are being applied to tax decisions today.
Outline
- Notable tax cases: introduction
- Cohan v. Commissioner
- Duberstein v. Commissioner
- United States v. Boyle
- Welch v. Helvering
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
- Gregory v. Helvering
- Other notable decisions
Benefits
The panel will cover these and other critical issues:
- Highlights of landmark tax rulings that continue to influence tax matters today
- When the Cohan Rule can provide significant tax benefits for certain taxpayers
- How key tax cases influence the determination of ordinary and necessary business expenses under IRC Section 162
- Analyzing and applying key elements of the most influential tax decisions
NASBA Details
Learning Objectives
After completing this course, you will be able to:
- Determine how prior tax decisions affect tax matters today
- Decide when application of the Cohan Rule could significantly benefit a taxpayer
- Ascertain how significant tax decisions impact the identification of ordinary and necessary business expenses under Section 162
- Identify key elements of significant tax cases and their impact on current tax situations
- Field of Study: Taxes
- Level of Knowledge: Intermediate
- Advance Preparation: None
- Teaching Method: Seminar/Lecture
- Delivery Method: Group-Internet (via computer)
- Attendance Monitoring Method: Attendance is monitored electronically via a participant's PIN and through a series of attendance verification prompts displayed throughout the program
- Prerequisite: Three years+ business or public firm experience preparing complex tax forms and schedules, supervising other preparers or accountants. Specific knowledge and understanding of individual income taxation, including itemized deductions, individual income tax credits, net operating loss limitations including carrybacks and carryforwards.

Strafford Publications, Inc. is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of Accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE Credits. Complaints regarding registered sponsons may be submitted to NASBA through its website: www.nasbaregistry.org.

Strafford is an IRS-approved continuing education provider offering certified courses for Enrolled Agents (EA) and Tax Return Preparers (RTRP).
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Unlimited access to Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses:
- Annual access
- Available on-demand
- Best for new attorneys
Related Courses

Admitting New Partners: Tax Consequences
Friday, May 30, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Key Issues in Succession Planning: Buy-Sell Agreements, Equity Grants, Profits Interests, Tax Considerations
Tuesday, June 17, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
How CPE Can Bridge the Gap Between What You Know and What You Need to Know
- Career Advancement