“Who's handling this?” is a deceptively simple question, and on complex work, the pause before someone answers can tell you a lot.
On a project with one or two people, the answer may be obvious enough that nobody has to ask. But once the work involves a partner, one or more associates, a paralegal, legal operations, and business services support, “obvious” stops being reliable, so the question starts getting asked out loud, which is usually a sign that role clarity slipped earlier than anyone noticed.
Role ambiguity is one of the easiest ways for complex work to lose momentum, even when everyone involved is capable and working hard. A partner assumes an associate is tracking a deadline. The associate assumes the paralegal already flagged it to the client. Legal operations assumes someone upstream made the call on scope. A marketing, finance, HR, or knowledge management colleague may be waiting for direction before moving a related workstream forward. Everyone is doing their own job well, but nobody is doing the job of making sure the pieces connect.
Different people contribute to complex work in different ways, which makes clarity about each person’s role especially important.”
The challenge is not deciding whether a partner, lawyer, paralegal, or business services professional is involved. The challenge is making sure everyone understands who is responsible for a specific deliverable, who is accountable for the outcome, who should be consulted before decisions are made, and who simply needs to be informed. When those expectations are explicit, coordination becomes easier and work is less likely to stall because of assumptions.
One tool that helps here doesn't take long to use. For each significant piece of work, ask who's responsible for doing it, who's accountable for the outcome, who needs to be consulted before a decision gets made, and who just needs to be kept informed. Those four categories, Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed, also known as RACI, rarely take long to answer once someone asks the questions out loud. What takes discipline is remembering to ask them before the work is underway, instead of after something has already fallen through.
The same clarity helps at the level of the whole project, not just individual tasks. Breaking complex work into phases, workstreams, deliverables, and dependencies makes it possible to assign ownership more clearly, instead of assuming one person is holding the whole sequence in their head. In attorney-facing versions, that might mean organizing stakeholder communications, coordinating due diligence activities, tracking draft milestones, managing approval workflows, or planning deliverables against key deadlines. In business services versions, it might mean a document-management rollout, office relocation, technology upgrade, project report, or another cross-functional initiative. Each smaller piece benefits from the same question the whole project does: who owns this?
None of this stays fixed once work starts moving. Scope expands, a stakeholder asks a new question, a client adds a second workstream, or an internal deadline shifts, and every one of those changes creates new work that needs an owner. Teams that keep pace ask the same short list of questions when something changes: what changed, what new work does it create, who's involved, and what does it do to the timeline and budget everyone already agreed to. Asking those questions on purpose is what keeps work from drifting into the kind of confusion that shows up later as a missed step or a surprised stakeholder.
Teams that handle complex work well tend to answer “who owns this?” early and revisit the answer when the work changes.
That kind of role clarity, along with tools like the RACI matrix and Work Breakdown Structure, is central to the Foundations of Project Management module in our new Project Management series. It's one of four modules, alongside modules on the project lifecycle, strategic planning and prioritization, and risk management. Versions are being created for both attorney and business professional audiences, with examples tailored to each learner group. The series is part of Professional Essentials, SkillBurst's library of 175+ professional skills modules for law firms.
See it for your team: Preview the Project Management series: skillburst.com/project-management-series or explore Professional Essentials: skillburst.com/professional-skills
Interested in reading more? Fill out the form to read the full article.