Construction and Bankruptcy: Avoiding Clawback; Preserving Defenses When a Project Partner Goes Bankrupt

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Real Property - Transactions
- event Date
Thursday, October 26, 2023
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE webinar will describe preference demands in bankruptcy and the financial effects these demands made by bankrupt construction project participants may have on their non-bankrupt project partners. The panel will discuss Section 547(c) defenses for preference demand recipients as well as noteworthy state law defenses with unique considerations for the construction industry. The panel will also provide best practices for assisting clients in preparing for and responding to preference demands.
Faculty

Ms. Cromeens holds more than 17 years of experience practicing construction, real estate, and business law. She has successfully filed more than a thousand lawsuits to foreclose or remove mechanic’s liens, with several of those being tried to a jury. Ms. Cromeens is on a mission to educate and inform subcontractors on the importance of understanding what they are signing, negotiating a fair subcontract, and understanding their lien and collections rights.

Ms. Sigmond is a partner in the Construction and Litigation practice groups at Greenspoon Marder, with over 40 years of legal experience. She specializes in construction and real estate matters, including arbitration, appeals, bid protests, contract preparation, mediation, litigation, receivership, and suretyship. Ms. Sigmond represents clients in construction defect litigation and helps expedite construction projects by ensuring proper contracts are in place. She has a strong background in litigating construction disputes for both public and private sector projects. Ms. Sigmond is well-versed in preparing various contract documents, such as design-build, construction management, guaranteed maximum price, and fixed-price contracts. Additionally, she serves as a mediator and arbitrator for construction and real estate cases with the New York County Supreme Court and the American Arbitration Association. Ms. Sigmond's experience extends to advising on receiverships, having worked with creditors and debtors in various receivership cases. She has played an active role in the New York construction law community, serving as Vice President of the New York State Bar Association and President of the New York County Lawyers Association. Ms. Sigmond is a frequent speaker and author on construction law topics and publishes “The Co-Op Condo Help Line” in the Mann Report.

Mr. Sparacino has more than 30 years' experience handling complex bankruptcy-related matters, including litigation, receiverships, and out-of-court restructurings. He has represented clients in bankruptcy matters throughout the U.S., including secured and unsecured creditors, ad hoc creditors’ committees, statutory creditors’ committees, trustees, equity security holders, companies reorganizing under Chapter 11, DIP lenders, and purchasers of distressed assets and companies. Mr. Sparacino also represents purchasers and sellers of assets, claims and equity interests in distressed situations. In addition, he has represented indenture trustees in connection with bond debt transactions, including new issuances, tender offers, exchange offers, redemptions, amendments, workouts, and bankruptcies. His experience spans several industries, including energy, manufacturing, financial services, technology, and real estate, among others.
Description
In an unstable commercial real estate market, construction project participants may be faced with one of their project partners filing for bankruptcy. One project participant's bankruptcy has rippling effects that can be detrimental to the whole project.
Once a party files for bankruptcy (the debtor), an automatic stay prohibits creditors--including those with whom the debtor is involved in a project--from seeking further payments. However, the debtor also has the ability to "clawback" or demand the return of all payments made by the debtor to their creditors during the 90-day period leading up to the bankruptcy filing (preference demands). This means that non-bankrupt project participants may suffer the financial consequences of not only possibly forfeiting future payments but also returning past payments unless they have a viable defense.
Bankruptcy Code Section 547(c) provides defenses to preference demands that can reduce or eliminate liability for non-bankrupt project participants. State laws provide additional defenses. Construction counsel should be aware of these defenses and how to advise their clients to prepare for and respond to preference demands.
Listen as our expert panel discusses the effects of preference demands on non-bankrupt construction project participants. The panel will describe federal defenses to these demands, including those in Section 547(c), and notable state law defenses. The panel will also provide best practices for assisting clients to prepare for and respond to preference demands.
Outline
- Introduction: overview of current real estate market and effect on construction projects
- Possible financial effects of project partner's bankruptcy on non-bankrupt project participants
- Preference demands
- Preference demand defenses
- Section 547(c) defenses
- Other federal defenses
- Noteworthy state considerations and defenses
- Insurance and surety bond considerations
- Best practices
Benefits
The panel will review these and other important considerations:
- What are possible financial repercussions that a project partner's bankruptcy may have on non-bankrupt project participants?
- What are the federal defenses to preference demands, including Section 547(c) defenses?
- What are state law considerations and noteworthy defenses?
- Under what circumstances should certain defenses be used when responding to preference demands?
- Are there any insurance and/or surety bond considerations?
- How can counsel help their clients prepare for possible preference demands when they first learn of a project partner's bankruptcy?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Unlimited access to Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses:
- Annual access
- Available on-demand
- Best for new attorneys
Related Courses

Antitrust Developments in Real Estate: Regulatory Updates, Compliance Challenges, Lessons Learned From Recent Cases
Thursday, July 31, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Gross, Modified Gross, and Net Commercial Leases: Allocating Expenses and Risks Between Landlords and Tenants
Wednesday, July 30, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
Explore the Advantages of Consistent Legal Language
- Learning & Development
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development
How to Build a Standout Personal Brand Without Sacrificing Billable Hours
- Career Advancement