BarbriSFCourseDetails
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack

Course Details

Course Information
  • smart_display Format

    On-Demand

  • signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level

    Intermediate

  • work Practice Area

    Real Property - Transactions

Date & Time
  • event Date

    Tuesday, October 22, 2024

  • schedule Time

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  • timer Program Length

    90 minutes

Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.

$297.00
CLE
ALL

This CLE webinar will provide a comprehensive overview of the contract structures used in very large construction projects, including traditional engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC), and engineering, procurement and construction management (EPCM) agreements. The panel will discuss the trend of creating customized or hybrid agreements to allocate heightened risks between contractors and owners, as well as the pros and cons of each project delivery method. The objective of the webinar is to help counsel help their clients select the best contract structures for their projects.

Faculty

Lexie Pereira
Attorney
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Ms. Pereira focuses her practice on all aspects of complex commercial litigation, with an emphasis on construction law. Her experience includes work on construction, insurance recovery, government contracts, and general litigation matters. Prior to joining Pillsbury, and while earning her J.D./M.B.A., she worked three years in-house at an ENR top 100 construction company where she provided legal, regulatory, and compliance support. Her work included negotiating and reviewing AIA and custom form subcontracts and owner contracts, leading e-discovery efforts, and assisting in training project team members on contract and compliance issues.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Robert A. James
Partner; Co-Leader, Projects Team
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

For more than 40 years Mr. James has helped clients achieve their goals on complex energy, construction and infrastructure transactions. His practice focuses on energy project development and acquisitions; complex commercial agreements and joint ventures; and engineering, procurement and construction contracts for facilities and infrastructure, including PPPs. Mr. James is a frequent author and lecturer on the development aspects of the energy transition, international investment projects, and other developing issues.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio
Jeffrey R. Gans
Partner, Chair Public-Private Partnership Team
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Mr. Gans advises owners, developers and contractors on major projects. His counseling, negotiating and litigation skills optimize his clients’ positions in complex engineering, procurement and construction; design-build; guaranteed maximum price and public-private partnership projects. Corporations, governments, universities and private developers rely on his broad experience to guide them in energy and commercial construction ventures that often exceed $100 million. Mr. Gans also crafts labor agreements, advises on union issues and litigates complex engineering, construction, insurance, fraud, bankruptcy, civil RICO and insurance claims.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio

Description

The size and risk of "giga" construction projects--those entailing hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars, involving numerous parties and authorities having jurisdiction, and extending over large periods of time--make for distinctive contracting challenges. Ordinary project variables, such as quality and safety, can become extraordinary at this scale and duration, contributing to risks of cost overruns, delays, and disputes that should be accounted for at the contract negotiation level to manage the risk to the contractor and protect the owner's project goals.

Contractors have become more reluctant to sign on to lump-sum EPC agreements that have traditionally allocated substantial risk their way. On the other end of the spectrum are EPCM agreements that allocate more risk to the owner and may thus be less desirable to owners. Protecting the interests of financers can introduce misalignment with efficient risk allocations between the contractor and owner.

In response to these concerns, counsel and their clients have become creative in developing customized or hybrid contract structures combining elements of EPC and EPCM agreements. Examples include using different pricing regimes on different project phases or scopes of work; deferring transfer of certain risks to contractors until appropriate schedule times; dividing segments of work between different contractors or joint ventures; and developing incentive compensation systems that align the interests of contractors with the interests of owners.

When developing alternative structures and stepping away from more traditional agreements to create bespoke contracts, counsel must carefully draft the agreement to reflect the parties' intent and be sure that the parties clearly understand their obligations to mitigate the risk of disputes.

Listen as our expert panel discusses various contractual structures used in mega construction projects including EPC, EPCM, and hybrid agreements. The panel will examine owner and contractor risk allocation and obligations under the more traditional EPC and EPCM agreements and will examine the trend of creating hybrid agreements and alternative methods of risk allocation.

Outline

  1. What are gigaprojects, and why might they drive consideration of alternative contract structures?
    1. Project size and complexity
    2. Novelty of technology application
    3. Number of parties and agencies
    4. Project duration
    5. Supply chain, contractor pool, and surety market issues
    6. Ability and willingness of contractors to absorb and manage risks
    7. Interests of financing sources
  2. Traditional and alternative contract structures
    1. EPC contracts
    2. EPCM contracts
    3. FEED and other front-end contracts
    4. Multiple phase EPC contracts with differing risk and pricing regimes
    5. Segmented scope EPC contracts
    6. Repeat supply chain contracts
    7. Design-bid-build (DBB) contracts
    8. Alliance and integrated project delivery (IPD) contracts
  3. How do different structures manage distinctive gigaproject risks?
    1. Contractor obligations and risks
    2. Owner obligations and risks
    3. Financing implications
    4. Case studies
  4. Selecting the right structure for your gigaproject
  5. Practitioner takeaways--the importance of gigaproject execution strategies

Benefits

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • How do the traditional EPC and EPCM agreements allocate risk and obligations between contractors and owners?
  • What are the benefits and limitations of customized and hybrid agreements to allocate risk and obligations between contractors and owners?
  • How can financing parties be part of the solution in implementing and executing efficient contract structures and risk allocations?