BarbriSFCourseDetails

Course Details

This CLE webinar will guide trademark counsel on international trademark protection after Abitron v. Hetronic (U.S. 2023). The panel will discuss the implications of the decision and what U.S. trademark owners should do if they believe there is foreign trademark infringement. The panel will also address brand protection and enforcement strategies within and outside the U.S.

Faculty

Description

The Supreme Court's decision in Abitron v. Hetronic (U.S. 2023) limited the extraterritorial reach of the Lanham Act. The Court held that infringement claims under the Lanham Act are limited to when the infringing use is domestic. However, the Court did not indicate when the infringing use in commerce of a trademark is domestic.

With the extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act limited, registration may be necessary or advisable to protect a trademark outside the U.S. Trademark owners should consider options such as the Madrid Protocol or national filing in the foreign jurisdiction.

With unanswered questions about "use in commerce," it is critical for trademark owners to have robust strategies in place for both brand protection and enforcement.

Listen as our authoritative panel of experienced trademark attorneys examines international trademark protection after Abitron. The panel will discuss the implications of the Abitron decision and what U.S. companies should do if they believe they are victims of foreign trademark infringement. The panel will also discuss how this informs and impacts a company's brand protection and enforcement strategies within and outside the U.S.

Outline

  1. Abitron v. Hetronic (U.S. 2023) and the implications for international trademark protection
  2. Foreign trademark infringement
  3. Brand protection and enforcement strategies
  4. Best practices

Benefits

The panel will discuss these and other key considerations:

  • What impact has the Abitron decision had on international trademark protection?
  • When can a trademark owner get damages if their mark is infringed out of the U.S.?
  • Where can trademark owners look to prevent infringement and protect their marks outside the U.S.?