Settling Trademark and Other IP Disputes: Key Lessons From 1-800 Contacts, Balancing Antitrust and IP Interests

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
- work Practice Area
Trademark and Copyright
- event Date
Thursday, September 9, 2021
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE course will guide IP counsel on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in the 1-800 Contacts case and the implications for trademark and other IP enforcement and settlement. The panel will offer best practices for how companies may reduce antitrust risks in settling trademark disputes and crafting such settlements in ways consistent with the court's concerns.
Faculty

Mr. Hogan’s practice focuses on IP litigation and counseling, including trademark, false advertising, copyright, right of publicity, licensing, trade secret, and patent matters. He has represented various corporations and individuals in a broad range of industries, including fashion, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, financial services, sports, entertainment, transportation, and online services. A significant portion of Mr. Hogan’s practice involves computer, Internet, and new media-related issues. Many of his matters have tested the application of traditional legal principles to the Internet and emerging technologies, such as in connection with issues of Internet jurisdiction, online contracting, and the application of trademark and copyright law to search engines, social media, mobile apps, and artificial intelligence. Mr. Hogan has been involved in cutting edge matters concerning the protection of data, and he has assisted clients with several substantial trade secrets and information security matters. He also represents clients in connection with rights of publicity, NIL rights, and the developing legal framework that governs uses of digital replicas.

Mr. Shores practices in the firm’s Antitrust and Litigation groups. He represents companies in high-stakes antitrust and other complex litigation at the trial and appellate levels in federal and state courts throughout the country. Mr. Shores has represented companies in numerous industries, including internet retail, financial technology, banking, energy, defense, and aerospace, in matters involving all types of antitrust claims under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and similar state laws, including price-fixing, market allocation, monopolization and attempted monopolization, tying, and exclusive dealing. He also has represented companies in matters involving intellectual property and the relationship between IP rights and competition laws. Mr. Shores recently served as Associate Deputy Attorney General & Senior Advisor for Technology Industries at the U.S. Department of Justice. In that role, he oversaw the Department’s antitrust review of major online platforms, leading to the government’s landmark monopolization case filed against Google in 2020.

Mr. Winemiller’s practice centers on patent, trademark, trade secret, and copyright litigation, but also includes IP licensing issues and trademark, patent, and copyright counseling and prosecution. He has represented clients in a broad range of industries, from electrical switches and electronic pet products to hosiery manufacturers and home builders. Mr. Winemiller has secured favorable trial and pre-trial results and significant settlement wins in disputes in federal courts. He also has extensive experience with commercial litigation, alternative dispute resolution, and appeals in state and federal courts. His ability to understand and articulate complex concepts in a way that decision-makers can understand helps him to proactively and effectively assist his clients in protecting their intellectual property assets.
Description
In 1-800 Contacts Inc. v. FTC (2d Cir. June 11, 2021), the Second Circuit determined the trademark settlements in question were typical and pro-competitive, thereby rejecting the FTC's assertion that the settlements by 1-800 Contacts violated antitrust law. The court provides important guidance for those considering settlement of trademark disputes as well as other IP disputes.
The decision also has broader implications for antitrust claims involving the enforcement of IP rights. The Second Circuit concluded that protecting a company's IP right constitutes a legitimate business interest that can justify restrictions on an allegedly infringing party in a settlement agreement. The case addressed trademark rights, but the reasoning will likely apply to other forms of IP.
The decision also offers guidance for minimizing antitrust risk when seeking a settlement. Companies and counsel need to note that, while the FTC's case again 1-800 Contacts was dismissed, antitrust issues can still arise.
Listen as our authoritative panel reviews the 1-800 Contacts decision and discusses the implications for trademark and other IP enforcement and settlement. The panel will also offer guidance on how companies may reduce antitrust risks in settling trademark disputes and crafting such settlements in ways consistent with the court's concerns.
Outline
- 1-800 Contacts v. FTC (2d Cir. 2021)
- Decision
- Implications for trademark settlements
- Implications for other IP enforcement and settlements
- Best practices for settling IP disputes
- Antitrust considerations and minimizing antitrust risk
Benefits
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- What are the implications of the 1-800 Contacts decision for trademark settlements?
- What are the broader implications for other types of IP enforcement and settlements?
- What lessons does the decision provide for companies considering settling trademark disputes with restrictions to analyze the antitrust risk of such arrangements?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Unlimited access to Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses:
- Annual access
- Available on-demand
- Best for new attorneys
Related Courses

Contracting, Product Integration, Clearance for Content Creation: Risk Mitigation
Friday, July 11, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Structuring Trademark Clearance Opinions
Tuesday, July 15, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Digital Fashion and Brand Protection: Leveraging Copyright, Trademark, and Trade Dress; Ownership Challenges
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Identification of Goods and Services in Trademark Applications: Key Considerations
Friday, July 25, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
Getting the Most Out of BARBRI Resources
- Learning & Development
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development
Transforming CLE from a Requirement to a Career Advantage
- Learning & Development
- Career Advancement
- Talent Development