BarbriSFCourseDetails
  1. keyboard_arrow_leftBack

Course Details

Course Information
  • smart_display Format

    Live Online with Live Q&A

  • signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level

    Intermediate

  • work Practice Area

    Trademark and Copyright

Date & Time
  • event Date

    Tuesday, June 24, 2025

  • schedule Time

    1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

  • timer Program Length

    90 minutes

Credit Information

  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.

$297.00
CLE
ALL

This CLE webinar will guide IP counsel on copyright issues associated with artificial intelligence (AI) image generators. The panel will examine eligibility for copyright protection in the U.S. and compare the U.S. approach with other countries. The panel will also discuss whether and when the creation and use of image generation tools and AI-generated images may infringe or violate the copyrights of others.

Faculty

Michael R. Graif
Partner
Brown Rudnick LLP

Mr. Graif’s practice focuses on trademark and copyright enforcement, technology transactions and licensing, artificial intelligence, trade secrets, fair use, and online brand protection, including social media, publicity and domain name issues. As a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US), he also advises his clients on data and privacy rights. Mr. Graif also counsels companies in AI matters. He develops and implements Generative AI guidelines, addressing confidentiality, IP and privacy issues, specifying approved GenAI tools, and training employees on responsible GenAI use. Mr. Graif also helps companies draft and negotiate AI development agreements, with a particular focus on data governance provisions, ensuring protection for developed models and input and output data, together with appropriate indemnities. He teaches social media law as an Adjunct Professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.

expand_circle_down Expand to View Full Bio expand_circle_up Collapse Bio

Description

AI programs are now readily available for all. Stability AI, Lensa, and other AI image creation tools create original works of art, raising the question of IP protection for such art. The United States requires human authorship in order to obtain copyright protection, and so far, the U.S. Copyright Office has declined to grant copyright registrations for AI-created works of art based on a lack of human authorship (one of these decisions is being challenged in Thaler v. Perlmutter (D.D.C. filed June 2, 2022)). While some countries take a similar approach to the US, others treat the issue of copyright eligibility for AI-generated art quite differently and provide at least some protection of computer generated works.

Questions have also been raised as to whether AI-generated images constitute derivative works and whether such images and the AI generation tools used to create them infringe third-party copyrights, or whether the fair use doctrine or other defenses may apply. The first lawsuits involving image generators have now been filed raising copyright claims in addition to other claims.

Listen as our authoritative panel of IP attorneys examines AI image generators and the associated copyright issues. The panel will discuss eligibility in the U.S. and the recent actions by the Copyright Office and contrast this with the approaches used in other countries. The panel will also address the recent cases that have been filed and the potential liability for copyright infringement in the U.S. and other countries.

Outline

I. AI-generated works of art and copyrightability

A. Eligibility in the U.S.

B. Eligibility in other countries

II. AI image generators and copyright infringement

A. Derivative works

B. Fair use and other defenses

C. Liability in other jurisdictions

D. Best practices

Benefits

The panel will review these and other critical issues:

  • What hurdles confront counsel when demonstrating authorship of AI-generated works?
  • How does copyright apply to AI-generated works? How does it differ across jurisdictions?
  • What steps can counsel take to increase the likelihood of success when seeking copyright protection for AI-generated works?