• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month November 11, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Ethics and Specialty Credits
  • schedule 90 minutes

Civility in Legal Practice: Communications, Discovery, Depositions, and Courtroom Conduct

Zealous Advocacy, Managing Inappropriate Client Demands, Civil interaction With Opposing Counsel, Responding to Incivility

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will explore how to maintain civility during those times in legal practice when the requirements of representation may become more contentious. The panel will discuss how to advocate civilly and effectively for clients during discovery, depositions, negotiations, court interactions, and communications with opposing counsel.

Description

Lawyers practice in settings where tension runs high, and parties' interests are most often directly opposed. Modern communication methods make it tempting and easy to respond quickly to a perceived slight or an unreasonable position. Incivility may develop quickly, particularly where counsel or the client believes that aggressive conduct provides an advantage.

Counsel must differentiate forceful advocacy from tactics that improperly embarrass, burden, delay, intimidate, or disrupt. Ethical and procedural rules limit an attorney's practices, conduct, and statements during discovery, communication, and representation before a tribunal. Uncivil conduct may expose counsel or the client to sanctions and/or other repercussions by the court. How should counsel respond when the opposition presents the problem?  

Lawyers must internalize best practices for managing communications, creating an appropriate record, establishing contact boundaries, and determining when judicial intervention becomes appropriate. Counsel must also address their own clients when they expect aggressive or forceful tactics that become improper or counterproductive.

Listen as our panel discusses civility in legal practice, the line between vigorous advocacy and improper conduct, and practical approaches for handling difficult counsel, clients, witnesses, and courtroom situations.

Presented By

Jon Schmidt
Minnesota Court of Appeals Judge
Minnesota Judicial Branch

Judge Schmidt was appointed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals by Governor Walz in September 2023. Before he joined the court of appeals, his legal career included public service, private practice, clerking for two distinguished appellate jurists, and teaching appellate advocacy. As a Minnesota Court of Appeals Judge, he is committed to ensuring fairness and equal justice for all people.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.

  • An excellent opportunity to earn Ethics CLE credits. Note: BARBRI cannot guarantee that this course will be approved for ethics credits in all states. To confirm, please contact our CLE department at pdservice@barbri.com.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Wednesday, November 11, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Civility and zealous advocacy: ethical and procedural limits

II. Communications and client demands

A. Email, texts, threats, personal attacks, and escalation

B. Counseling clients seeking aggressive tactics

III. Discovery and depositions

A. Handling scheduling, extensions, discovery disputes, and meet-and-confer obligations

B. Objections, witness treatment, and suspending/terminating the deposition

IV. Negotiations: hard bargaining, misrepresentation, harassment, unnecessary burden

V. Courts, sanctions, and protecting the record

A. Courtroom conduct and interactions with judges

B. Preserving objections, seeking intervention, and avoiding sanctions

VI. Practitioner takeaways

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • Distinguishing zealous advocacy from offensive, abusive, or unnecessarily burdensome tactics
  • Managing contentious emails, communications, client demands, and negotiations
  • Avoiding and responding to incivility during discovery and depositions
  • Responding to uncivil courtroom conduct, including sanctions and judicial intervention