Class Action Defense and Pre-Certification Motions for Summary Judgment: Minimizing the Likelihood of Certification

Course Details
- smart_display Format
On-Demand
- signal_cellular_alt Difficulty Level
Intermediate
- work Practice Area
Class Action and Other Litigation
- event Date
Thursday, July 20, 2023
- schedule Time
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- timer Program Length
90 minutes
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
This CLE webinar will discuss the questions of can and should a corporate defendant move for summary judgment before class certification, and if so, as to the claims of individual plaintiffs or class claims as a whole. The panel will also examine the relationship between discovery strategy and summary judgment strategy. Finally, the program will consider any risks if summary judgment is denied and possible advantages in narrowing the case or forcing plaintiffs to reveal weaknesses related to certification or merits.
Faculty

Mr. Maatman has nearly four decades of experience practicing law and has defended some of the most significant bet-the-company cases ever filed against corporate America. He has represented companies, executive teams and boards across the country in class action litigation, ranging in size from thousands to hundreds of thousands of claims by employees. Among Mr. Maatman's accomplishments, he defended and defeated the largest systemic enforcement action ever brought in the history of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the first Attorney General prosecution of a Wall Street company for workplace discrimination and harassment, and the largest wage and hour class and collective actions ever brought in Florida and New York. While he is known to be a fierce litigator, Mr. Maatman also helps his clients anticipate large-scale litigation risks before they happen to prevent issues that could turn into litigation. Mr. Maatman pioneered the process of conducting employment-practices audits to assist employers in structuring effective and practical personnel policies and protocols. He also writes and lectures extensively on class action and employment litigation topics. Mr. Maatman has authored six books on employment law topics and has spoken to employer groups throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, Europe, Canada and Mexico.

Ms. Riley has defended companies faced with significant complex litigation matters for more than two decades. She regularly defends companies facing class actions, collective actions, pattern or practice lawsuits, and other types of representative proceedings, ranging in size from dozens to tens of thousands of claims. Ms. Riley has represented clients facing bet-the-company cases in a wide range of complex civil litigation matters in federal and state courts across the country. She also provides counsel to employers seeking to navigate thorny issues, including investigations, compliance, and terminations. Ms. Riley is a regular speaker, author, and presenter regarding class action issues, legal developments, and challenges that companies may face in the future.
Description
Plaintiffs obtain class certification up to approximately 75 percent of the time, notwithstanding the defense bar's formidable talents and efforts and despite defense-favorable trends in the case law. With this reality in mind, defendants are now rethinking whether to move for summary judgment before certification is decided.
Historically, pre-certification summary judgment attempts were seen as potentially inefficient because even if successful, only the named plaintiffs would be bound. But, as recent cases demonstrate, winning summary judgment can end the case and close the chance for certification, causing defendants to reconsider. In some cases, futile claims can be eliminated and the ruling can dissuade others from filing.
Whether to seek summary judgment is integrally related to discovery strategy. Some defendants have concerns that bifurcation can be counterproductive in the long run. If the defense's summary judgment motion eliminates some claims before class certification, courts would consider only the viable claims for certification, which would affect settlement considerations. Forcing plaintiffs to respond to summary judgment may induce its own benefits.
Listen as this world class panel of class action defense attorneys discusses the benefits, risks, and rewards of moving for summary judgment before certification.
Outline
- Reasons defense bar is reassessing summary judgment before certification
- Importance of discovery strategy
- Setting goals and expectations for summary judgment
- Best practices
Benefits
The panel will discuss these and other key issues:
- Should a defendant move for summary judgment before certification as to the named plaintiffs' claims individually or as to all class claims?
- Are there advantages even if the motion only narrows the case or forces plaintiffs to respond in an individualized way?
- What kind of cases or issues are best suited for pre-certification summary judgment?
- Should discovery be limited or bifurcated?
- How does the court or the identity of plaintiffs' counsel affect the analysis?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Related Courses

Authenticating Disputed E-Signatures at Trial: ESIGN and UETA, Experts, Burdens of Proof, Audit Trails
Friday, February 28, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT

Concurrently and Ethically Representing Companies, Owners, and Employees in the Same Matter
Monday, May 19, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
Recommended Resources
Explore the Advantages of Consistent Legal Language
- Learning & Development
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development