• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month August 17, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Personal Injury & Med Mal
  • schedule 90 minutes

Deposing Opponents' Experts in Personal Injury Cases: Preparation, AI Tools, Goals, Techniques

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will provide techniques for eliciting from even seasoned expert witnesses favorable testimony and admissions for impeachment, disqualification, exclusion of testimony, or leverage for settlement negotiation.

Description

More and more frequently, personal injury cases are won or lost during expert depositions, and even in smaller moments within depositions. Successfully questioning a professional witness with a high level of expertise requires both tireless preparation and advanced deposition-taking skills. Handling massive amounts of reports or prior testimony requires having the right team and the right tools, potentially including AI.

The speakers will discuss how trial lawyers should prepare in order to be ready to attack the experts' qualifications, prior opinions, and testimony. Our speakers will also provide tips for teeing up impeachment at trial, challenging the expert's methodology, and gaining the upper hand in settlement negotiations.

One of the most important goals of expert depositions is eliciting testimony to support FRE 702 or Daubert challenges.

Listen as our authoritative panel provides proven strategies for overcoming the most complex expert deposition hurdles and using those depositions to obtain favorable settlements or verdicts by taking the wind out of the opposing expert's sails.

Presented By

Robert E. Johnston
Partner
Hollingsworth LLP

Mr. Johnston is an experienced trial lawyer, litigator, and appellate advocate practicing primarily in the areas of pharmaceutical products, toxic tort, and insurance. With over 26 years of experience, he has tried cases to verdict or obtained judgment for clients in courts throughout the U.S. Called upon to solve clients’ most challenging problems, Mr. Johnston often handles high-profile, landmark cases, presenting cutting-edge litigation theories and defenses for some of the largest companies in the country. He also represents smaller companies and individuals with significant matters. Mr. Johnston is a frequent author and lecturer on litigation issues and developments.

Louis M. Russo
Partner
Hollingsworth LLP

Mr. Russo practices complex litigation defense, handling a variety of pharmaceutical, medical device, products liability, and toxic tort matters. He has significant experience in all aspects of products liability litigation, including fact and expert discovery, proceedings before the Federal Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, pleading and summary judgment motions, Daubert/Frye motions, trials, appeals, and settlement strategy. In his insurance coverage practice, Mr. Russo represents policyholders in coverage disputes arising out of tort and products liability claims. On this front, he often represents clients seeking coverage as additional insureds pursuant to agreements with business partners. Mr. Russo also has experience representing policyholders seeking coverage under commercial property and casualty insurance policies.

Bradley J. Smith
Litigation Managing Partner
Keefe, Campbell, Biery and Associates, LLC

Mr. Smith is a Litigation Managing Partner at Keefe, Campbell, Biery and Associates, LLC.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Monday, August 17, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I.   Preparing for the deposition

II.  Deposing the expert – purposes

III. Deposing the expert – techniques

IV. Practice pointers for planning for FRE 702 motions and state counterparts


The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • Preparing to attack the expert's qualifications
  • Locating expert's prior opinions and testimony
  • Deciding how to use AI tools; safeguards
  • Attacking the expert's methodology at the deposition
  • Setting up deposition testimony for use in FRE 702 motions
  • Increasing settlement value by discrediting the opposing expert
  • Identifying areas where the expert is not prepared