• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month September 22, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Personal Injury and Med Mal
  • schedule 90 minutes

Trucking Crashes Caused by Driver Fatigue: Replacing Circumstantial Evidence With Forensic and Expert Analysis

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will discuss trucking cases alleging that driver fatigue caused or contributed to a commercial motor vehicle crash, that the company's practices and culture are responsible for the fatigue, and how the evidence in these types of cases has metamorphosed since the implementation of electronic logging devices (ELDs).

Description

Proving (or disputing) driver fatigue in a trucking case has become far more complex and expert-dependent since ELDs became mandated for all motor carriers and drivers were required to keep records of duty service under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's hours-of-service regulations. Instead of depending on circumstantial evidence of impaired performance, loss of attentiveness, slower reaction times, impaired judgment, and increased probability of falling asleep at the wheel, plaintiffs and defendants now focus on forensic analysis of data from ELDs, GPS, vehicle telematics, distraction detection technologies (FDDTs), in-cab cameras, Qualcomm/Omnitracs messaging, ECM or "black box" data, cell phone location records, dispatch communications, and all manner of other electronic data sources. Counsel in these cases must understand what and where this new evidence is, how to obtain it, who can introduce it, and the privacy interests in it. 

But digital devices can be tampered with and digital records can be falsified. All the electronic data now must be cross-checked. Driver fatigue cases now involve litigating regarding ELD editing, unassigned driving time, ghost-driver schemes, multiple logins, device tampering, non-certified ELD usage, and more. A company's dispatch practices, pay incentives, or poor ELD oversight are almost always on trial, as well as whether anyone attempted to cover them up. 

Proving some level of driver fatigue is not enough, however. Plaintiffs must also prove that the fatigue caused the crash and the injuries by showing that a non-fatigued driver would have reacted differently. Key causation experts include accident reconstructionists, sleep experts, and human factors experts. Drivers and companies in multi-vehicle accidents may have significant contributory negligence or other defenses. 

Listen as our experienced panel discusses how fatigue cases have dramatically changed since ELDs became mandatory and offers practical guidance for arguing fatigue cases. 

Presented By

Nancy Grugle, Ph.D., CHFP
Human Factors Expert
Cognizant Forensics

Dr. Grugle is a board-certified Human Factors Professional (CHFP) with over 25 years of academic, research, industry, and forensic experience in the field of human factors. She specializes in transportation-related human factors issues such as driver inattention (fatigue, distraction, impairment), perception-reaction time, nighttime visibility and conspicuity, looming, gap judgment and acceptance, and expectancy and positive guidance. Dr. Grugle works on cases nationwide. She conducts investigations for both Plaintiff and Defense counsel (approximately 50/50) and has been qualified in both state and federal courts.

Matthew A. Smartnick
Partner
Amundsen Davis

Mr. Smartnick's practice is predominantly devoted to transportation industry clients, with an emphasis on commercial carriers and operators facing catastrophic loss claims. He is a key member of the firm’s Rapid Response Team, responsible for providing immediate on-site investigation and counsel after a trucking incident and working in tandem with third parties to preserve evidence. Beyond the transportation industry, Mr. Smartnick defends aviation maintenance facilities, municipal entities, and public sector employees in civil litigation matters across jurisdictions in Michigan and Ohio.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Tuesday, September 22, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Introduction: cause and effect of sleep debt

II. Establishing how the crash occurred

III. Defining fatigue vs. non-fatigue

A. Evidence of driver fatigue in a specific driver

B. Circumstantial evidence

C. Forensic evidence

D. Reconstructing the 24 to 72 hours before impact

IV. Establishing impact of company practices and procedures

V. Causation analysis: demonstrating a properly rested driver would have avoided or mitigated the crash

VI. Alternative causation issues

VII. Identifying and working with experts: plaintiff and defense 

VIII. Defenses

The panel will review these and other important topics:

  • How is driver fatigue defined or measured, generally and by individual driver?
  • How does counsel get the electronic data from all relevant sources?
  • What is a driver fatigue management policy?
  • Does a driver have privacy interests in FDDT data?