- videocam Live Online with Live Q&A
- calendar_month November 12, 2025 @ 1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
- card_travel International
- schedule 90 minutes
DOJ Scrutiny of Export Controls and Sanctions Violations: Mitigating Risk of Corporate Criminal Prosecution
Lessons From Recent Cases, Developing Robust Compliance Programs, Navigating Self-Disclosure Process
Welcome! Strafford is now BARBRI! The expert courses you know from the trusted global leader in legal education.
Description
Criminal liability may be incurred by companies when employees or agents violate export controls or sanctions laws under various federal criminal statutes. Counsel should be able to guide their corporate clients through the steps they should take to minimize such criminal exposure.
Those steps include maintaining robust compliance programs with rigorous due diligence, oversight, and auditing capabilities to detect and address misconduct. However, if wrongdoing occurs, companies may consider taking advantage of the NSD's Enforcement Policy for Business Organizations (the Policy) by promptly initiating internal investigations, identifying root causes of the compliance violations, taking appropriate corrective actions, and timely submission of a voluntary self-disclosure.
Recent cases demonstrate how companies that have taken advantage of the Policy have benefited when the NSD decides not to prosecute based on the companies' proactive measures. For example, when Universities Space Research Association (USRA) received an inquiry from NASA about the sale of software licenses to China-based purchasers, the company promptly began an investigation. When the suspected employee admitted to wrongdoing, the company quickly self-disclosed the violations to NSD within days of the employee's admission. The DOJ declined to prosecute USRA for several reasons including its timely and voluntary self-disclosure of the wrongdoing.
Listen as our expert panel examines under what theories of liability companies may be held criminally liable for export controls and sanctions violations committed by their employees and agents. The panel will discuss lessons that can be learned from recent decisions where the DOJ declined criminal prosecution, identify measures that companies can take to mitigate risk of criminal prosecution when an employee or agent violates export controls or sanctions laws, and outline the various factors that weigh into a voluntary self-disclosure decision.
Presented By
Mr. Gauch is a member of Morrison & Foerster's National Security Practice Group. He advises clients on a range of matters, including navigating export controls under the ITAR and EAR, global economic sanctions, compliance risk assessments, and CFIUS review. Mr. Gauch routinely advocates before government regulators such as OFAC and CFIUS and has secured licenses and approvals, responded to administrative subpoenas, and engaged in various other agency-engagement efforts to further client interests. He also regularly conducts due diligence reviews of corporate transactions from an international trade perspective.
Ms. Searcey is a member of the International Trade and White Collar Defense and Investigations practice groups. She advises clients on U.S. trade laws designed to accomplish a range of foreign policy, national security, and human rights goals, focusing her practice on compliance with economic sanctions, export controls, and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Her experience includes conducting internal investigations and representing clients before numerous regulatory agencies (such as the Departments of Treasury, Commerce, Justice, and Homeland Security), including responding to subpoenas and resolving enforcement matters. Ms. Searcey also advises clients regarding the development of their compliance and ethics programs and conducts trade-related risk assessments, including supply chain due diligence targeting forced labor risks.
Mr. Syarief advises clients on all aspects of U.S. economic sanctions and export controls, with significant experience in enforcement risk assessment, internal investigations, compliance program design, and restricted-party screening protocols. He routinely represents clients before OFAC, BIS, and DDTC, securing licenses and approvals, filing voluntary self-disclosures, responding to administrative subpoenas, and resolving enforcement matters. He regularly conducts international trade due diligence in corporate transactions and financings, often on behalf of private equity firms. Mr. Syarief is especially well-versed in sanctions authorizations and exemptions relating to telecommunications, internet, and virtual currency, and has advised leading social media platforms and fintech firms on leveraging these provisions. In addition to practice, Mr. Syarief frequently publishes and speaks on sanctions and export control developments. He has chaired the Export Controls, Sanctions, and Anticorruption Subcommittee of the International Bar Association’s International Commerce and Distribution Committee and co-organized its 2024 Specialist Conference in Washington, D.C. He also serves as an Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center, where he teaches U.S. economic sanctions and export controls.
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
-
Live Online
On Demand
Date + Time
- event
Wednesday, November 12, 2025
- schedule
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
I. Introduction
II. Relevant federal statutes and theories of corporate criminal liability
III. Steps that companies can take to mitigate risk of criminal prosecution
A. To prevent wrongdoing
1. Compliance programs
2. Due diligence, oversight, and auditing
B. When wrongdoing occurs
1. Investigations
2. Corrective actions
3. Voluntary self-disclosure considerations
IV. Lessons from recent cases
V. Practitioner takeaways
The panel will review these and other important issues:
- Under what theories of liability may companies be held criminally liable for employee or agent violations of export controls or sanctions laws?
- What measures can companies put into place to mitigate the risk of this type of wrongdoing from occurring?
- What steps should companies follow when they discover that an employee's or agent's wrongdoing has already occurred?
- What are best practices for helping clients create a robust compliance program? For guiding clients through an NSD investigation?
Unlimited access to premium CLE courses:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for attorneys and legal professionals
Unlimited access to premium CPE courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for CPAs and tax professionals
Unlimited access to premium CLE, CPE, Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses.:
- Annual access
- Available live and on-demand
- Best for legal, accounting, and tax professionals
Unlimited access to Professional Skills and Practice-Ready courses:
- Annual access
- Available on-demand
- Best for new attorneys
Related Courses
New DOJ Guidance for FCPA Investigations and Enforcement: Updated Priorities, Corporate Compliance Strategies
Wednesday, December 17, 2025
1:00 PM E.T.
Recommended Resources
Explore the Advantages of Consistent Legal Language
- Learning & Development
- Business & Professional Skills
- Talent Development
Navigating Modern Legal Challenges: A Comprehensive Guide
- Business & Professional Skills
- Career Advancement