Description
Litigators must be able to analyze and critique opposing expert reports. More than simply reading the report is required. Counsel must understand the expert's logic, note areas of agreement and disagreement, and test assumptions.
Counsel should apply the same exercise before submitting one's expert reports to ensure that the expert's opinions are sound and entirely consistent with the facts of the case.
By carefully understanding and dissecting the report, counsel can see how to discredit the credibility and accuracy of the opposing expert's conclusions and further support counsel's analysis, conclusions, and opinions. This review may also lead to settlement leverage.
Listen as this experienced panel sheds new light on deconstructing and evaluating expert reports.
Presented By
Mr. Blumen exclusively handles personal injury and workers’ compensation cases. He produces favorable results because of a clearly-defined mission to listen to clients and achieve their goals through responsible and effective representation on a cost-efficient basis.
Mr. Holthus is a Partner at Freeman Mathis & Gary's Columbus office. His primary area of focus is on civil rights and government liability, corporate law, employment, and general liability matters. Mr. Holthus has tried, advocated and or arbitrated nearly one hundred cases before civil juries, administrative licensing (and other) boards and arbitration panels throughout Ohio (and California), in both state and federal court.
Mr. Marzulla is one of the nation’s leading water, property, and environmental lawyers. As Assistant Attorney General in charge of the U.S. Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, he learned firsthand the operations and litigation styles of his client agencies: EPA, Interior Department, Bureau of Reclamation, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Department of Transportation, and Department of Commerce.
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
-
Date + Time
- event
Wednesday, May 25, 2022
- schedule
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- What a well written expert report should contain
- Analyzing the report
- Understanding the opposing party's argument
- Identifying contradictions
- Avoiding self-contradictions
- Providing alternatives to areas believed to be incorrect
- Verifying suspect research and methodologies
- Applications to commonly seen experts
The panel will review these and other essential questions:
- Why do many attorneys fail to glean as much leverage as they could from expert reports?
- How can counsel spot and eliminate confirmation bias when reviewing reports?
- What are common red flags of logical fallacy?
- What should counsel do if the opposing expert's report seems insurmountable?
- What practices can speed up the review, and what are the most valuable if time is short?
Related Courses
Prior Inconsistent Statements in Social Media and Inactive Websites: Planning for Amendments to FRE 801(d)
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT