• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month June 16, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Real Property - Transactions
  • schedule 90 minutes

Forum Selection and Choice of Law Provisions in Construction Contracts: Home Court Laws, Enforceability Challenges

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will examine the importance of carefully drafting forum selection and choice of law provisions in construction contracts. The panel will address the rise of home court laws impacting construction contracts and how these may affect the drafting of these terms specifically and even contractual negotiations generally. The panel will also offer best practices for drafting enforceable clauses to protect client interests in case of a dispute.

Description

Forum selection and choice of law provisions are some of the most significant terms in construction contracts because they control every aspect of the parties' obligations and liabilities undertaken on a project based on the laws of the selected jurisdiction. Yet these terms may be given little thought, are often comprised of boilerplate language, and usually relegated to the back of the contract. This is problematic when disputes arise and the parties find these provisions to be unenforceable, thereby subjecting them to a different forum or jurisdiction's laws than was anticipated during negotiations.

Additionally, a growing number of states have enacted home court laws of varying scope that dictate the enforceability of choice of law and forum provisions in construction contracts. For example, Texas recently amended its statutes declaring that, for projects located in Texas, any forum selection clause that requires venue for litigation or arbitration in another state or choice of law provision that requires the dispute be governed by another state's laws are void as against public policy. The parties may only agree to a different venue after a dispute arises. 

The requirements of these home court laws may vary greatly. Some states require construction disputes for projects in the state to be resolved under its laws and in its courts; other states require only that its laws govern but do not require the dispute to be resolved there. Also, there may be different triggers as to when the statute applies. 

Counsel should be aware of how these home court laws may affect, not only the drafting of choice of law and forum selection clauses, but contract negotiations overall as these may be impacted by the law that will be applied if a dispute arises.

Listen as our expert panel provides a comprehensive overview of forum selection and choice of law provisions in construction contracts. The panel will discuss the importance of careful drafting, examine the impact of home court laws, and offer best practices for drafting enforceable terms to protect clients' interests.

Presented By

Michael S. McCauley
Partner
Jones Day

Mr. McCauley represents Fortune 500 companies and leaders from many industries in complex construction and commercial disputes. He represents and advises public and private owners, design professionals, and contractors involved in disputes in a broad range of projects, including highway, building, energy, and industrial. Mr. McCauley has represented clients at trial and in arbitrations and has won many of his cases on dispositive motions. For cases that have gone to trial, Mr. McCauley has prevailed in all of them. For example, he prevailed in an arbitration for DIRECTV that resulted in an award of more than $28 million and a complete victory on a $50 million counterclaim. Mr. McCauley also prevailed in a trial in Orange County Superior Court for the Los Angeles Unified School District against a contractor asserting $90 million in damages against the School District for allegedly wrongfully terminating its contract. He also represented the Transbay Joint Powers Authority in the complex, highly publicized cases involving the movement of the Millennium Tower in San Francisco. Mr. McCauley is a frequent author and lecturer on construction legal issues.

Daniel D. McMillan
Partner
Jones Day

Mr. McMillan represents owners, design professionals, and contractors in large construction disputes and in negotiating and drafting the full panoply of contracts for major projects. Equally comfortable in the boardroom as the courtroom, clients turn to Mr. McMillan on their most challenging matters when judgment and experience matter most. He is a member of the Disputes Resolution Board Foundation, the Association of International Energy Negotiators, the International Bar Association, and the ABA Forum on Construction Law. Mr. McMillan served on the executive board of the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation, taught appellate advocacy as an adjunct professor at Loyola Law School, and has been an instructor for the National Institute of Trial Advocacy. He served on the California Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation (2007-2010), which evaluates judicial candidates and reports to the governor. Mr. McMillan is frequent speaker and writer on issues of interest to the construction industry and the legal profession, his many publications include: State and Local Construction Projects: An Attorney's Handbook (ABA 2017); Dispute Review Boards and the Construction Industry: The Song Remains the Same - Or Does It?; and "Truth or Consequences: California's False Claims Act," L.A. Daily Journal (Oct. 21, 2009).

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Tuesday, June 16, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Introduction: the importance of carefully drafted forum selection and choice of law provisions in construction contracts

II. Key drafting considerations generally

A. Forum selection provisions

B. Choice of law provisions

III. The rise of home court laws

A. Notable state laws

B. Varying scopes of requirement

C. Drafting considerations

IV. Best practices for drafting enforceable provisions

The panel will review these and other important issues:

  • How may forum selection and choice of law provisions impact construction disputes? Therefore, why is boilerplate language to be avoided?
  • How has the rise of home court laws impacted the negotiation and drafting of these provisions? 
  • What are best practices for drafting enforceable forum selection and choice of law provisions in construction agreements?