Description
To avoid the abuse of power under Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA) amended Section 547(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to subject a trustee’s exercise of his or her preference avoidance powers to two requirements. Now, the plaintiff may avoid allegedly preferential transfers "based on reasonable due diligence in the circumstances of the case" and "taking into account a party's known or reasonably knowable affirmative defenses under subsection [547](c)" before commencing suit.
Some case law has developed but controversy still exists regarding what these elements require a trustee to do. The Bankruptcy Code does not define "due diligence under the circumstances of the case" and this will no doubt be the subject of litigation in the future. No one is certain whether reliance on the debtor's filings in the bankruptcy case constitutes "reasonable diligence in the circumstances of the case" or if a trustee must review additional records. Moreover, it is unknown what the consequences will be where a debtor's available books and records are limited or incomplete.
Equally unknown is what it means to adequately "take into account" the defendant's "known or reasonably knowable" Section 547(c) affirmative defenses, such as "contemporaneous exchange," "ordinary course," and "new value" (as well as other potential defenses). The analysis may be more complicated if the transferee was an insider.
Listen as our authoritative panel of bankruptcy practitioners reviews leading cases and guides you through Section 547(b).
Presented By
Mr. Blansky's practice focuses on commercial and bankruptcy litigation. He frequently prosecutes avoidance claims on behalf of bankruptcy trustees, assignees for the benefit of creditors, and other plaintiffs. He is admitted to practice in the District and Bankruptcy Courts of the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida and Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, and in the Courts of the States of Florida and New York. Mr. Blansky is a frequent speaker on the subject of avoidance litigation. He previously presented for Strafford on Preference Actions: Clarifying the Trustee's Pre-Filing Due Diligence. He is also a Supreme Court of Florida Qualified Arbitrator and writes a topical legal blog, A Lawyer in Florida.
Mr. Hochheiser is a leading practitioner in the areas of creditors’ rights and bankruptcy law. He advises and represents businesses, regional and national banks, credit unions, equipment lessors and other lenders, as well as secured and unsecured creditors.
Mr. Kerschner is a managing associate in the firm's Business Restructuring, Creditors’ Rights & Bankruptcy practice group. He focuses his practice on complex commercial transactions, workouts and bankruptcy matters.
-
This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.
-
Date + Time
- event
Wednesday, August 31, 2022
- schedule
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT
- Section 547(b) prefiling requirements
- Reasonable due diligence in the circumstances of the case
- Known or knowable defenses under 11 USC 547(c)
- Common defenses
- Contemporaneous exchange
- Ordinary course of business
- New value
- Consequences of failing to comply with one or both requirements
- Judgment
- Bankruptcy Rule 9011
- Venue issues in 28 USC 1409(b)
The panel will review these and other essential matters:
- What is "reasonable due diligence in the circumstances of the case"?
- What is "a known or reasonably knowable affirmative defense"?
- Will the plaintiff's analysis of defenses, if done by attorneys or accountants, be privileged or discoverable?
- How will defendants establish a lack of due diligence or failure to take known defenses into account?
- What are the consequences if a court finds that these conditions are not met?
Related Courses
Prepackaged and Prenegotiated Chapter 11 Reorganizations: Debtor and Creditor Strategies
Thursday, October 30, 2025
1:00 p.m. ET./10:00 a.m. PT