• videocam Live Webinar with Live Q&A
  • calendar_month August 11, 2026 @ 1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT
  • signal_cellular_alt Intermediate
  • card_travel Litigation
  • schedule 90 minutes

AI Protective Orders: Controlling Unauthorized Exposure of Confidential Discovery to Generative AI Platforms

About the Course

Introduction

This CLE webinar will examine how protective orders are addressing the risk of opponents uploading confidential information produced in discovery to generative AI platforms that can then capture and disclose the material for training or to third parties. The panel will discuss this swiftly evolving but critical area of law and offer practical insights for effective and enforceable provisions for controlling the use of AI. The panel will also review guidance being provided by the courts.

Description

Standard protective orders prohibit disclosure of confidential information outside specific protocols, include claw-back provisions, and require everyone to return/destroy all copies at the end of their involvement in the case. AI platforms typically disclaim all of these safeguards. 

Publicly available AI platforms keep all information submitted to it, use that information for training, and reserve the absolute right to share the information with third parties, although proprietary or closed AI programs may not be so broad. As a result, protective orders should now include provisions addressing the use of AI to analyze confidential materials produced in discovery, but these provisions are often disputed. Mechanisms for oversight and enforcement are crucial. Counsel should also be reviewing existing protective orders to determine the existence of gaps and possible fixes in pending cases. 

One renowned commentator has identified four emerging approaches for AI provisions in protective orders, ranging from a blanket prohibition to pre-use opportunity to object. Courts still grapple with whether AI should be considered more like a third party or just another tool or vendor, and what the consequences should be of inadvertent disclosure to an AI platform. Because the stakes are high.

Listen as our experienced panel offers best practices for ensuring effective AI provisions in protective orders. 

Presented By

Kaitlyn E. Stone
Partner, Artificial Intelligence Co-Chair
Barnes & Thornburg

Ms. Stone counsels leading health and life sciences, pharmaceutical, and medical device companies in product liability and mass tort matters, with an emphasis on prescription medications, medical devices and consumer goods. Her areas of focus span multidistrict litigation (MDL), class actions, and coordinated state proceedings involving thousands of plaintiffs to single-plaintiff disputes. Ms. Stone is also a formidable advocate on behalf of clients in intricate business, commercial, and real estate litigation, with extensive experience in intellectual property, insurance defense, business tort, land use, environmental, and public contract litigation. In addition to serving as co-chair of the firm’s AI group, she also helps to lead Barnes & Thornburg’s AI Practice Champions, a group of nearly 40 attorneys across the firm designated to advance the practical use of AI within their practice group and help translate the firm's AI strategy into day-to-day client work.

Jin Yoshikawa
Member
Butler Snow

Mr. Yoshikawa is a member of Butler Snow’s Drug and Medical Device Litigation Practice Group. He handles a diverse range of matters including nationwide multidistrict product liability litigation, healthcare liability actions, and pro bono matters. Mr. Yoshikawa wears many hats, drafting and arguing motions, managing complex e-discovery, analyzing complex medical records and engineering documents, taking and defending depositions, and coordinating litigation teams. He also has experience litigating trademark and copyright disputes in federal and state courts and the USPTO. As a first-generation American and Japanese native speaker, Mr. Yoshikawa is heavily involved in activities advancing U.S.-Japan economic and cultural exchange, the Asian-Pacific Islander community, and diversity and inclusion.

Credit Information
  • This 90-minute webinar is eligible in most states for 1.5 CLE credits.


  • Live Online


    On Demand

Date + Time

  • event

    Tuesday, August 11, 2026

  • schedule

    1:00 PM ET/10:00 AM PT

I. Relevant rules on protective orders

II. How AI systems differ from traditional discovery tools

III. Effect on privilege and work product of using various types of AI

IV. Efforts at adapting protective orders to AI 

A. Total prohibitions

B. Requiring AI providers to agree to the protective order provisions

C. Requiring AI contracts to prohibit retention, storage, use, or disclosure

D. Requiring notice, consent, and security measures

V. Strategies and practical steps

The panel will review these and other important questions:

  • How would agentic AI be used in discovery?
  • How does believing that discovery materials will be uploaded into an AI platform change the way parties behave in discovery, and how might these assumptions be incorporated into AI protective orders?
  • How much information about an opponent's AI platform is relevant to drafting and negotiating AI protections?
  • What effective remedies exist if confidential information is submitted to AI, which then discloses or retains it?